Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp525919pxk; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:27:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZ9KDVKgy6o7m/WDte2AA8ofOvAq6OzNapNSWLZUXchlzMk+ATSf4rR9EY6J+aF819u8QY X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:72c5:: with SMTP id du5mr5124004ejc.469.1599676048920; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:27:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599676048; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0kAP5Qe4Rl3SG7jI3B4msCUODWx1j2qK/ngyK5kB2r7pk6+U5oJkMwB/IXn6d8ppx5 lO7HiXyQeEF8dU32wSsgsYXXkcI/QSebIGFBqSaqSEyJ/05+/DEJ0GyTi4WsORIoQ4/f wpjq9JBmE1aLDz2sgvwKJYZZdKdCn/t376vmNxLz6PG/x/9zYspLDCZwbyfQwVELlIiK GokCXIuBuEcbeeN0q0dLoUJSxaAswgP+07l0v3kZVz2hdEkEdvqWf/xwLXqRkWCuE7Fq wi5JBgUTbxlo32mSZE1XgVJfsJb7qXLfY24I5s9w8LRuwoXA2lRNc35yDUFyEARxim2+ eg8A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=hlW5Drv0YzWJDBPeOb29SiaflrOgi3f9TisT2mG2y/Q=; b=hw4+1kFrBQ55GgTJgOn8taiUheq6IqeezRNrVLuVGKQceBZYH8Gw4xi1Emxz2up06v LEPeWgDHE5Gg89U9Ybo7sxcEogThy1EpLI/eadtLWCJ7E/thhTj6AMIvx5A5YQs6rjZH L3nr1H3P/9wLjiLB/uRpd8EmTkVCH6C/nljTjlIQnLm6Jow77hRNkFobNV/BroJh5hVB te7mmJ8FemgDSI6xa8URFUDcxB/9pobZ96WfPRvBRJZyZC+bj1+JlprlHWLKCP+Jgj+L K+KJSL+kjJV4YEK8PZnQihWwols6NpdN1j23Gu0JQ7iH9vBBoqpAazoF612Ae9tIZBNt bSlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M3ZUCZLU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l25si2054562edv.228.2020.09.09.11.27.04; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M3ZUCZLU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727055AbgIIS0Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:26:24 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:39939 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725975AbgIIS0W (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:26:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599675978; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hlW5Drv0YzWJDBPeOb29SiaflrOgi3f9TisT2mG2y/Q=; b=M3ZUCZLUK210t014i6D8qAptpoOk+B1zcbVlPxBf9AkWF3RGUOFMVuXtKWIg4mjNTQiG67 WY15GjWPXUNpGjIrMxQiaU9dRAtKwqM4o0LJmq0xVS2QYoOkn/cCekzXA1nBFu7DpI5ga1 1aGGNpW2IFO0gYYFMI2SpajctgdPRpY= Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-215-cJUsN-CDPVqeNByDH18rzw-1; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:26:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cJUsN-CDPVqeNByDH18rzw-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id l5so2381332qtu.20 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:26:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hlW5Drv0YzWJDBPeOb29SiaflrOgi3f9TisT2mG2y/Q=; b=Vao9ITWG+7di9tooZ+3racxc6H1fosCPQxUAF9E0gAaoikelamSfjbX8ECdiGnAQgb uFAlxNeP8qOYR3f+wgMWNgAG3vWjpZSuJWnc6OeVue9CFsWBy5iYDQtf4UIaqzN62Acm n7Lk3j/mIV0Y//EHfcNv1ElIhO7RWxHJsRhWxhse74pxm0lBtwxPD9IwbCGupvqvqEs2 Sef4/LFdd4lrKuVP9EyrzRwe2ocbtQnwMl5I1uh7gKcXtzh5fudelsuw7C/jpd2GJbS5 CieTjp9cg4Fwhj0ncv14Yuv7oxzaBJHpQbQwYxtYpMlXBBEdRr0si+kztrrEGE1hFTTk eX4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331jIaq/O8YV/f2ejTS2eD+NT5SN6HGZG3r9BQ3sX/tfE5lhDMf 7ivgfPke4nYseF10pBCck1ta3vKc3RPxoNpMdNwU0/4KgGFLgesWyuxwaB6MkDAkhvp83qXTnBa NCXbnVwPCXGjZULQdsD1kO6oD X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa4d:: with SMTP id t74mr4622654qke.222.1599675974093; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:26:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa4d:: with SMTP id t74mr4622628qke.222.1599675973751; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ruby.lyude.net (pool-108-49-102-102.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [108.49.102.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm3938674qtj.79.2020.09.09.11.26.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: For MST hub, Get max_link_rate&max_lane from extended rx capability field if EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FILED_PRESENT is set. From: Lyude Paul To: Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Cc: Koba Ko , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Anthony Wong Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:26:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200909182010.GO6112@intel.com> References: <20200827053053.11271-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> <20200909182010.GO6112@intel.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 21:20 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:33:09PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > We just added a new helper for DPCD retrieval to drm_dp_helper.c (which > > also > > handles grabbing the extended receiver caps), we should probably make use > > of > > it here > > Someone should really rework this whole thing so that the driver can > pass in the link rate+lane count when setting up the link. There's no > reason to assume that the source device capabilities match or exceed > the MST device caps. It would also allow the driver the dynamically > adjust these in response to link failures. I'm a bit confused, I also think we should pass the link rate+lane count in (especially since it'll be very helpful for when we start optimizing PBN handling in regards to bw constraints), but I'm not sure what you mean by "There's no reason to assume that the source device capabilities match or exceed the MST device caps", aren't we doing the opposite here by checking the MST device caps? > > > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:31 +0800, Koba Ko wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:30 PM Koba Ko wrote: > > > > Currently, DRM get the capability of the mst hub only from DP_DPCD_REV > > > > and > > > > get the slower speed even the mst hub can run in the faster speed. > > > > > > > > As per DP-1.3, First check DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT. > > > > If DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT is 1, read the > > > > DP_DP13_DPCD_REV > > > > to > > > > get the faster capability. > > > > If DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT is 0, read DP_DPCD_REV. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Koba Ko > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 10 +++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > > index 67dd72ea200e..3b84c6801281 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > > @@ -3497,6 +3497,8 @@ static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 > > > > dp_link_bw, > > > > u8 dp_link_count) > > > > int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr > > > > *mgr, > > > > bool mst_state) > > > > { > > > > int ret = 0; > > > > + u8 dpcd_ext = 0; > > > > + unsigned int dpcd_offset = 0; > > > > struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb = NULL; > > > > > > > > mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock); > > > > @@ -3510,9 +3512,15 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct > > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, bool ms > > > > struct drm_dp_payload reset_pay; > > > > > > > > WARN_ON(mgr->mst_primary); > > > > + drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, > > > > + DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL, > > > > + &dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext)); > > > > + > > > > + dpcd_offset = > > > > + ((dpcd_ext & > > > > DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT) ? DP_DP13_DPCD_REV : > > > > DP_DPCD_REV); > > > > > > > > /* get dpcd info */ > > > > - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, DP_DPCD_REV, mgr- > > > > >dpcd, > > > > DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE); > > > > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, dpcd_offset, mgr- > > > > >dpcd, > > > > DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE); > > > > if (ret != DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE) { > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to read DPCD\n"); > > > > goto out_unlock; > > > > -- > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > Add Lyude Paul > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Lyude Paul (she/her) > > Software Engineer at Red Hat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat