Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:45:53 +0000
From:   tsoni@codeaurora.org
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc:     Tingwei Zhang <tingweiz@codeaurora.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@codeaurora.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
        Mao Jinlong <jinlmao@codeaurora.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] coresight: allow to build coresight as modules
In-Reply-To: <20200909161523.GA553266@xps15>
References: <20200820054718.20115-1-tingwei@codeaurora.org>
 <CANLsYkwhypfEkmhg=wK+_F6TxxGiuoSqpgGR0REqsOqC-X-3mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0101017470c9475d-00e296fc-1173-4afa-95cb-22ac70d85d5b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
 <20200909161523.GA553266@xps15>
Message-ID: <01010174749e1e01-e99c3e27-f22b-4b22-83a7-36c0b86c5bdd-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.CZuq2qbDmUIuT3qdvXlRHZZCpfZqZ4GtG9v3VKgRyF0=:AmazonSES
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-09-09 09:15, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:54:33AM +0000, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:53:51AM +0800, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> > Hi Tingwei,
>> >
>> > Apologies for the untimely response to this set, I am hoping to get to
>> > it in the next two weeks.
>> >
>> 
>> It's fine, Mathieu. Please let me know your comments once you have 
>> time.
>> I'm targeting to get these set merged in 5.10 Kernel.
> 
> From the above it is not clear if you want this set to be _in_ the 5.10 
> cycle
> or added to my list _during_ the 5.10 cycle, which would make it part 
> of the
> 5.11 cycle.  In any case the latter seems more realistic.

Tingwei can correct me here, but we prefer to have patches to be part of 
the 5.10 release. It means they should get merged in Linus's tree in the 
next merge window.

---Trilok Soni