Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:31:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:31:34 -0500 Received: from gate.tao-group.com ([62.255.240.131]:11527 "EHLO mail.tao-group.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:31:18 -0500 Subject: [RFC] 2.4.11-dontuse packages From: Andrew Ebling To: ftpadmin@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.28.14.02 (Preview Release) Date: 30 Oct 2001 12:31:29 +0000 Message-Id: <1004445089.485.17.camel@spinel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Really for ftpadmin@kernel.org but CC'd to lkml for discussion purposes.) Dear Sir/Madam, **Request for change regarding naming of 2.4.11-dontuse packages** I am currently working on the patch-kernel scripts included with the kernel source code to add functionality to automate the process of downloading and applying successive patches from the users nearest kernel mirror. Would it be possible to return the 2.4.11* packages to the standard naming convention and use some other method to indicate that kernel version 2.4.11 should not be used? (e.g. put another empty file in the directory called "patch-2.4.11-dont-use" rather than breaking the naming convention). Of course, I could put an ugly work around in the script for 2.4.11, but keeping the standard naming convention would be a better solution. I do plan to warn users if they use the script to request kernel version 2.4.11, but unfortunately, use of the 2.4.11 patch is neccessary to get to 2.4.12 and above. Thank you for your time, Andrew Ebling - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/