Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3D976C433CA
Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 23:56:47 +0000
From:   Tingwei Zhang <tingweiz@codeaurora.org>
To:     tsoni@codeaurora.org
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@codeaurora.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
        Mao Jinlong <jinlmao@codeaurora.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] coresight: allow to build coresight as modules
Message-ID: <01010174754ce1c8-c53380ae-5d29-492f-a6c9-64bd0e16197d-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
References: <20200820054718.20115-1-tingwei@codeaurora.org>
 <CANLsYkwhypfEkmhg=wK+_F6TxxGiuoSqpgGR0REqsOqC-X-3mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0101017470c9475d-00e296fc-1173-4afa-95cb-22ac70d85d5b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
 <20200909161523.GA553266@xps15>
 <c8737d9935a1b7a7372c41492939648d@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c8737d9935a1b7a7372c41492939648d@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.CZuq2qbDmUIuT3qdvXlRHZZCpfZqZ4GtG9v3VKgRyF0=:AmazonSES
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:45:52AM +0800, tsoni@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 09:15, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:54:33AM +0000, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> >>On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:53:51AM +0800, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >>> Hi Tingwei,
> >>>
> >>> Apologies for the untimely response to this set, I am hoping to get
> to
> >>> it in the next two weeks.
> >>>
> >>
> >>It's fine, Mathieu. Please let me know your comments once you have time.
> >>I'm targeting to get these set merged in 5.10 Kernel.
> >
> >From the above it is not clear if you want this set to be _in_ the 5.10
> >cycle
> >or added to my list _during_ the 5.10 cycle, which would make it part of
> >the
> >5.11 cycle.  In any case the latter seems more realistic.
> 
> Tingwei can correct me here, but we prefer to have patches to be part of the
> 5.10 release. It means they should get merged in Linus's tree in the next
> merge window.

Yes.  The target is to merge this series into Linus's tree in 5.10 Kernel.

Thanks,
Tingwei

> 
> ---Trilok Soni