Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751268AbWE3NNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2006 09:13:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751400AbWE3NNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2006 09:13:09 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:14528 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751268AbWE3NNI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2006 09:13:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:12:53 -0400 From: Josef Sipek To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel , Linux Memory Management , Chris Mason , Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Linus Torvalds , mike@halcrow.us, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page? Message-ID: <20060530131253.GC1297@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> References: <447AC011.8050708@yahoo.com.au> <20060530055115.GD18626@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <447BE9E9.4000907@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447BE9E9.4000907@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1350 Lines: 33 On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:44:57PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Josef Sipek wrote: > >On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:34:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >... > > > >>Can we get rid of the whole thing, confusing memory barriers and all? > >>Nobody uses anything but the default sync_page > > > > > >I feel like I must say this: there are some file systems that live > >outside the kernel (at least for now) that do _NOT_ use the default > >sync_page. All the stackable file systems that are based on FiST [1], > >such as Unionfs [2] and eCryptfs (currently in -mm) [3] (respective > >authors CC'd). As an example, Unionfs must decide which lower file > >system page to sync (since it may have several to chose from). > > OK, noted. Thanks. Luckily for them it looks like sync_page might > stay for other reasons (eg. raid) ;) > > Any good reasons they are not in the tree? eCryptfs got recently into -mm, my guess would be that Mike Halcrow will try to get it into vanilla in the coming months. Unionfs is into process of getting ready for a review by the fs-devel & linux-kernel crowd. Josef "Jeff" Sipek. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/