Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp876813pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:24:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+cMKKA0nIrOWIIvfEFUutQSUL+kFDds1ThU7JM67yUUS6dL3Mf//bdMUFvRvPsJQso5XU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d4c:: with SMTP id a12mr7174820ejt.64.1599722696961; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:24:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599722696; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BpB/gqyvdvdfqNQk5KBsAW2rzKxMztFNrFGIMOBN2v///VynF4vvv+hztvN4q2Cwe9 tLv1MbKt+CuE3QZ6Hp9bMet2Dd9eHGcsRpk4umIBjTmPsFFb0mskXpH9dEm+jdXRgpe5 S41boC6oUo0/g6Ww/ktdemtx0h1eTjrOzkGguviAYE2SymVqn7CbXQA6zVddTW6sKQk7 z7XOY+e3wb/QiQh00aFxFdwLgbOFROSECWE9c66adxUltgAJ9sjYbebsE4QMp3ah5MKB pYz9TVAMjAIuSnlA2jGUtreUac+14h3/a2mlswRENptVgVzHBn/J8D82XNb7K9/Ftbji dD0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=YId7rUgCOYH/BU5ZVdW0vFZa8CarilAQf5jTCJsymOY=; b=QSEQkud9FSCctYx+P2E1cL4EaiSJxBGBZ2Co4aULZEeGHNxT05x57+yNSZNpsl53oD Kn4vHTvqrIrLlep04n5xoXjbNEe4q5rTzZPnBGAmLasUG1msNUY+wGXDKgVIOSMfAk6/ iIOQG9+2yfVSaapg2TFbWJQMOP/9t1gUyQtb1P1kfM05l3jYezgZvBAaRscHoDrTODMW ZBA4qIAPaJebCY2TwIh9lHFVQMEtWcNUo+3y9Diqpx83wi8z0hqwR2oeoHhvm3l/jPFV y0/64hnNMf50ylpaUFDA02zyjK71WXN+S+5Re9fZlE8LFtrcL9SWEhnTJUoweHypAxA3 DJqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e11si3083533edj.448.2020.09.10.00.24.33; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728297AbgIJHX4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:23:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54574 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730262AbgIJHXe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:23:34 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA18B165; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:23:31 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Laurent Dufour Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , rafael@kernel.org, nathanl@linux.ibm.com, cheloha@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations Message-ID: <20200910072331.GB28354@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <5cbd92e1-c00a-4253-0119-c872bfa0f2bc@redhat.com> <20200908170835.85440-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <20200909074011.GD7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <9faac1ce-c02d-7dbc-f79a-4aaaa5a73d28@linux.ibm.com> <20200909090953.GE7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <4cdb54be-1a92-4ba4-6fee-3b415f3468a9@linux.ibm.com> <20200909105914.GF7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <74a62b00-235e-7deb-2814-f3b240fea25e@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <74a62b00-235e-7deb-2814-f3b240fea25e@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 09-09-20 18:07:15, Laurent Dufour wrote: > Le 09/09/2020 ? 12:59, Michal Hocko a ?crit?: > > On Wed 09-09-20 11:21:58, Laurent Dufour wrote: [...] > > > For the point a, using the enum allows to know in > > > register_mem_sect_under_node() if the link operation is due to a hotplug > > > operation or done at boot time. > > > > Yes, but let me repeat. We have a mess here and different paths check > > for the very same condition by different ways. We need to unify those. > > What are you suggesting to unify these checks (using a MP_* enum as > suggested by David, something else)? We do have system_state check spread at different places. I would use this one and wrap it behind a helper. Or have I missed any reason why that wouldn't work for this case? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs