Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp905881pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpXMz5U0dzxjpkuaHNQl8TCxqyqPgfHX8LmDieeO0yGV/JwqTJZxt8ebfGtCFXittajk07 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2354:: with SMTP id m20mr7413357eja.341.1599726689294; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599726689; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DUCiWuW0wzSl2oblRzgLAvSBEzYKUDtptQVuTelZjG1sijIjAMeuF3lmZIgtnIZhTw S4qK9RTdykayFAhefq41bDYxIcfbLixyn8hObxKV3sxYBIqXk0KkJwrH0HSybTRMiHDd +sjh5A5a3Qy51ALYItD/SONf5d7H0n8S2B7hnCnKrZ1kgp+16AcNpqIR9+d7VkRbewRq LYEX3sEPCurKSmdhXDjQ+JukVyfYPqfMouN/nG9wLdd8N/FTJd9UGNeCShWXXYWH4L+m ClkcmB0rBPWXRlNjGDet7Gk24oBwpMO7cQg+PkZxdWvZYx3XoagPImFiEqQbX4nSSTrR PrkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=URUYTzAa9xj2DVP1guVV7MTh41eAgSIbAyrZi8yxaO0=; b=H5r8Z9+Ckw9u/phRVQrMfoMSDahD7ih6UdzddsjIWVarNxUtL2qN4Gja3MzmTTxFXM zpz4GjmThoKEd3sMhLOlWTL6cMmJJiLIi8yH6u5cSkKStUcqUe4q60I0kcxpyEA18sFf SkiukxeYMFVuOiek5RmiEXamYPH43nQxqGVUD+SCws/9KTc6McEk1EuPZevYSF0ZOaOX MSj9teJv2Od9Qm5ipHu5xRWWuo1Gcp/aKrzeP+ejsNRC02dVdZZHdDBIOLBi5TiYXJ7L Ew9OZju2Rzzd92Azv9c/vR9z2Txx0wp2wWr/8vnJeRCLotzk4/yaZmbs3Tlb3qVJ8SWW Z4TA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SHk9y4+K; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v15si2908773edw.67.2020.09.10.01.31.06; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SHk9y4+K; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730438AbgIJI0g (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:26:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56517 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730210AbgIJIQa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:16:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599725771; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=URUYTzAa9xj2DVP1guVV7MTh41eAgSIbAyrZi8yxaO0=; b=SHk9y4+KuIbmciB4WoKiBWxpfayI0ZdzCFIvZQWglAKjoTwI5SVcK1/epb7mBYJij4DF6T t9DYbnGB5Z+ebx3mKEiLDZFFZGBsLyw/tvsdIzWHlk1rs+GDTSTPWagqfEP4rYTJvALt0m c5z17gkKeVJIL5cEkN//WXQnz2g+g5Q= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-405-yITyzstPNWOjYsY7fUZC5A-1; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:16:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yITyzstPNWOjYsY7fUZC5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BE18797C3; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.212] (ovpn-112-212.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.212]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646C77E175; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio/fsl-mc: trigger an interrupt via eventfd To: Diana Craciun OSS , alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bharatb.linux@gmail.com, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com, Bharat Bhushan References: <20200826093315.5279-1-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> <20200826093315.5279-9-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> <6c6d803a-2c01-dc44-383c-a7ca5e0556e3@oss.nxp.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:16:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6c6d803a-2c01-dc44-383c-a7ca5e0556e3@oss.nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Diana, On 9/7/20 4:02 PM, Diana Craciun OSS wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 9/4/2020 11:02 AM, Auger Eric wrote: >> Hi Diana, >> >> On 8/26/20 11:33 AM, Diana Craciun wrote: >>> This patch allows to set an eventfd for fsl-mc device interrupts >>> and also to trigger the interrupt eventfd from userspace for testing. >>> >>> All fsl-mc device interrupts are MSIs. The MSIs are allocated from >>> the MSI domain only once per DPRC and used by all the DPAA2 objects. >>> The interrupts are managed by the DPRC in a pool of interrupts. Each >>> device requests interrupts from this pool. The pool is allocated >>> when the first virtual device is setting the interrupts. >>> The pool of interrupts is protected by a lock. >>> >>> The DPRC has an interrupt of its own which indicates if the DPRC >>> contents have changed. However, currently, the contents of a DPRC >>> assigned to the guest cannot be changed at runtime, so this interrupt >>> is not configured. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan >>> Signed-off-by: Diana Craciun >>> --- >>>   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c         |  18 ++- >>>   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_intr.c    | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++- >>>   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h |  10 ++ >>>   3 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >>> b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >>> index 42014297b484..73834f488a94 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >>> @@ -147,12 +147,28 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_open(void *device_data) >>>   static void vfio_fsl_mc_release(void *device_data) >>>   { >>>       struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data; >>> +    int ret; >>>         mutex_lock(&vdev->reflck->lock); >>>   -    if (!(--vdev->refcnt)) >>> +    if (!(--vdev->refcnt)) { >>> +        struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; >>> +        struct device *cont_dev = fsl_mc_cont_dev(&mc_dev->dev); >>> +        struct fsl_mc_device *mc_cont = to_fsl_mc_device(cont_dev); >>> + >>>           vfio_fsl_mc_regions_cleanup(vdev); >>>   +        /* reset the device before cleaning up the interrupts */ >>> +        ret = dprc_reset_container(mc_cont->mc_io, 0, >>> +              mc_cont->mc_handle, >>> +              mc_cont->obj_desc.id, >>> +              DPRC_RESET_OPTION_NON_RECURSIVE); >> shouldn't you test ret? >>> + >>> +        vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_cleanup(vdev); >>> + >>> +        fsl_mc_cleanup_irq_pool(mc_cont); >>> +    } >>> + >>>       mutex_unlock(&vdev->reflck->lock); >>>         module_put(THIS_MODULE); >>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_intr.c >>> b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_intr.c >>> index 058aa97aa54a..409f3507fcf3 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_intr.c >>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_intr.c >>> @@ -29,12 +29,149 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_irq_unmask(struct >>> vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev, >>>       return -EINVAL; >>>   } >>>   +int vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_allocate(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev) >>> +{ >>> +    struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; >>> +    struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq *mc_irq; >>> +    int irq_count; >>> +    int ret, i; >>> + >>> +    /* Device does not support any interrupt */ >> indent needs to be fixed >>> +    if (mc_dev->obj_desc.irq_count == 0) >>> +        return 0; >>> + >>> +    /* interrupts were already allocated for this device */ >>> +    if (vdev->mc_irqs) >>> +        return 0; >>> + >>> +    irq_count = mc_dev->obj_desc.irq_count; >>> + >>> +    mc_irq = kcalloc(irq_count, sizeof(*mc_irq), GFP_KERNEL); >>> +    if (!mc_irq) >>> +        return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> +    /* Allocate IRQs */ >>> +    ret = fsl_mc_allocate_irqs(mc_dev); >>> +    if (ret) { >>> +        kfree(mc_irq); >>> +        return ret; >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    for (i = 0; i < irq_count; i++) { >>> +        mc_irq[i].count = 1; >>> +        mc_irq[i].flags = VFIO_IRQ_INFO_EVENTFD; >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    vdev->mc_irqs = mc_irq; >>> + >>> +    return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static irqreturn_t vfio_fsl_mc_irq_handler(int irq_num, void *arg) >>> +{ >>> +    struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq *mc_irq = (struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq *)arg; >>> + >>> +    eventfd_signal(mc_irq->trigger, 1); >>> +    return IRQ_HANDLED; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev, >>> +                           int index, int fd) >>> +{ >>> +    struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq *irq = &vdev->mc_irqs[index]; >>> +    struct eventfd_ctx *trigger; >>> +    int hwirq; >>> +    int ret; >>> + >>> +    hwirq = vdev->mc_dev->irqs[index]->msi_desc->irq; >>> +    if (irq->trigger) { >>> +        free_irq(hwirq, irq); >>> +        kfree(irq->name); >>> +        eventfd_ctx_put(irq->trigger); >>> +        irq->trigger = NULL; >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    if (fd < 0) /* Disable only */ >>> +        return 0; >>> + >>> +    irq->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio-irq[%d](%s)", >>> +                hwirq, dev_name(&vdev->mc_dev->dev)); >>> +    if (!irq->name) >>> +        return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> +    trigger = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd); >>> +    if (IS_ERR(trigger)) { >>> +        kfree(irq->name); >>> +        return PTR_ERR(trigger); >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    irq->trigger = trigger; >>> + >>> +    ret = request_irq(hwirq, vfio_fsl_mc_irq_handler, 0, >>> +          irq->name, irq); >>> +    if (ret) { >>> +        kfree(irq->name); >>> +        eventfd_ctx_put(trigger); >>> +        irq->trigger = NULL; >>> +        return ret; >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>>   static int vfio_fsl_mc_set_irq_trigger(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device >>> *vdev, >>>                          unsigned int index, unsigned int start, >>>                          unsigned int count, u32 flags, >>>                          void *data) >>>   { >>> -    return -EINVAL; >>> +    struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; >>> +    int ret, hwirq; >>> +    struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq *irq; >>> +    struct device *cont_dev = fsl_mc_cont_dev(&mc_dev->dev); >>> +    struct fsl_mc_device *mc_cont = to_fsl_mc_device(cont_dev); >>> + >>> +    if (start != 0 || count != 1) >>> +        return -EINVAL; >>> + >>> +    mutex_lock(&vdev->reflck->lock); >>> +    ret = fsl_mc_populate_irq_pool(mc_cont, >>> +            FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS); >>> +    if (ret) >>> +        goto unlock; >>> + >>> +    ret = vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_allocate(vdev); >> any reason the init is done in the set_irq() and not in the open() if >> !vdev->refcnt? > > Actually yes, there is a reason. It comes from the way the MSIs are > handled. > > The DPAA2  devices (the devices that can be assigned to the userspace) > are organized in a hierarchical way. The DPRC is some kind of container > (parent) for child devices. Only the DPRC is allocating interrupts (it > allocates MSIs from the MSI domain). The MSIs cannot be allocated in the > open() because the MSI setup needs an IOMMU cookie which is set when the > IOMMU is set with VFIO_SET_IOMMU. But iommu is set later, after open(), > so the MSIs should be allocated afterwards. > > So, the DPRC is allocating a pool of MSIs and each child object will > request a number of interrupts from that pool. This is what > vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_allocate does: it requests a number of interrupts from > the pool. OK, thank you for the clarifications. Thanks Eric > > >>> +    if (ret) >>> +        goto unlock; >>> +    mutex_unlock(&vdev->reflck->lock); >>> + >>> +    if (!count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE)) >>> +        return vfio_set_trigger(vdev, index, -1); >>> + >>> +    if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) { >>> +        s32 fd = *(s32 *)data; >>> + >>> +        return vfio_set_trigger(vdev, index, fd); >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    hwirq = vdev->mc_dev->irqs[index]->msi_desc->irq; >>> + >>> +    irq = &vdev->mc_irqs[index]; >>> + >>> +    if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) { >>> +        vfio_fsl_mc_irq_handler(hwirq, irq); >>> + >>> +    } else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) { >>> +        u8 trigger = *(u8 *)data; >>> + >>> +        if (trigger) >>> +            vfio_fsl_mc_irq_handler(hwirq, irq); >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    return 0; >>> + >>> +unlock: >>> +    mutex_unlock(&vdev->reflck->lock); >>> +    return ret; >>>   } >>>     int vfio_fsl_mc_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev, >>> @@ -61,3 +198,24 @@ int vfio_fsl_mc_set_irqs_ioctl(struct >>> vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev, >>>         return ret; >>>   } >>> + >>> +/* Free All IRQs for the given MC object */ >>> +void vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_cleanup(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev) >>> +{ >>> +    struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; >>> +    int irq_count = mc_dev->obj_desc.irq_count; >>> +    int i; >>> + >>> +    /* Device does not support any interrupt or the interrupts >>> +     * were not configured >>> +     */ >>> +    if (mc_dev->obj_desc.irq_count == 0 || !vdev->mc_irqs) >>> +        return; >>> + >>> +    for (i = 0; i < irq_count; i++) >>> +        vfio_set_trigger(vdev, i, -1); >>> + >>> +    fsl_mc_free_irqs(mc_dev); >>> +    kfree(vdev->mc_irqs); >>> +    vdev->mc_irqs = NULL; >>> +} >>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >>> b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >>> index d5b6fe891a48..bbfca8b55f8a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >>> @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ >>>   #define VFIO_FSL_MC_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index)    \ >>>       ((u64)(index) << VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT) >>>   +struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq { >>> +    u32         flags; >>> +    u32         count; >>> +    struct eventfd_ctx  *trigger; >>> +    char            *name; >>> +}; >>> + >>>   struct vfio_fsl_mc_reflck { >>>       struct kref        kref; >>>       struct mutex        lock; >>> @@ -35,6 +42,7 @@ struct vfio_fsl_mc_device { >>>       struct vfio_fsl_mc_region    *regions; >>>       struct vfio_fsl_mc_reflck   *reflck; >>>       struct mutex         igate; >>> +    struct vfio_fsl_mc_irq      *mc_irqs; >>>   }; >>>     extern int vfio_fsl_mc_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device >>> *vdev, >>> @@ -42,4 +50,6 @@ extern int vfio_fsl_mc_set_irqs_ioctl(struct >>> vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev, >>>                      unsigned int start, unsigned int count, >>>                      void *data); >>>   +void vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_cleanup(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev); >>> + >>>   #endif /* VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H */ >>> >> Thanks >> >> Eric >> > > Thanks, > Diana >