Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1258744pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:50:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz11b9jiOcyncs+Zwg/V3aWnMo1ShZNkbjJm/fxj5Ejo7XqDFxIuL0va2rXVIvZTiSwm+DT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7856:: with SMTP id p22mr9865940ejm.262.1599760241994; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:50:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599760241; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LrBiEo7mEqFlRNgckAY95+clr3JmvtenUgjd0zpXFmxDSWEj/KUTJlQxtqaz07W04+ yPs3RhaQbwYkPNt06u+7Qj7Hrhf4SAhJxLJ7sL0x09MfF7zDeIlxVvmMUHMI91PxOf40 S2awjeIfCaAAKrM/raA2IMtlE46FTI6eaOV4FNk3xxzW+O5lC/fIJR3duIg/XSfkgLH/ w2omkdtF+6+3SPF8RFI+rSj9Zfju9QX4vudduosTOkqJxTGKxWThHofxyP/zJM1X7NIm T/cIIT/kT96EGdmWntP8QouZB6DsuWrY7JfJEU+zSkzDtGLCH2sYK9n4slVUPzee1e4X YmHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=ehkzB4LttygthmWCADkLgwoMYDzvXG4NiI7HnkwKLek=; b=EjFm6es3y24hAxtYGeLXdE/BFqggqnzoH5g1yqg7eIXBJnbb0QAhDwhcGwYk0kXXla j+aPUYYZ5OIt9med1mQlSgq4SrEGBTjp0afyILF8d+n41CPPAHYXEOGSC4RGFCSIgrrA tuRSet7MxzGkUbPF4OYF6gpQsrhZ6NmWcUxExg5WRpxCw3kylybbFYRwgYn2VNUpcPns 8DCFaRTtQV1Xnzb1yVddV7wCBjU4o7tGL23UHlvZAUSOFpgipCfgPClP2sHu5BxgeER5 5aqqjsudOlsuTwDlS6mUWF9/wHYcSMZsIgVKCPnpHUpC4BSIowINfRH/4gKGQYtvbMRa lJOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UTdhcYLv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si3945989ejn.410.2020.09.10.10.50.18; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UTdhcYLv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726780AbgIJRte (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:49:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:36292 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727857AbgIJRsI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:48:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599760085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ehkzB4LttygthmWCADkLgwoMYDzvXG4NiI7HnkwKLek=; b=UTdhcYLvxBi1Bau5hz+Iqcq8FJ1trQs3Ri4rHYhT7OJAy2vtlTY0OV8114J7XMI8BOE84T iBkK/x0ugwEGSeSRP9u11aAlt+EBULrNEo0ap1l/LxC+LQ6MGZkGpBMMA3b5ETUPLnzTPp 89KEijfzCTb2wl4kXMtVK4sniABb+rs= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-286-jz0-BJkJM5SSKqcPNeS_jw-1; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:48:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jz0-BJkJM5SSKqcPNeS_jw-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id r4so4082982qkb.12 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ehkzB4LttygthmWCADkLgwoMYDzvXG4NiI7HnkwKLek=; b=q9EHz/7r0XbwMBZgdbAv6dd/YPeAVsNvWyNayXlyu/q4M+QaoDrRFTrub5fASUZAC7 yCntIyoLwRr7BcvBQcuqvkSNC8rGT41L+0dOUgZFeGlouoANrIGt588ttx9O2+5jYPwl tld8zOytnHfu1Kr27KzU0GSSCv6KtAfGaztcsBey+BlRIk/dlhuTP8DPalsbG4Gq4Ker W/nEL3IOtjVBK+TQ/XX9zodc5EiX4eIyZEb8FHBzymnny8d6mmP8kW7hdwiqPIyDDo1l 2oq8yuzC4jKniHEtRE+Cu2Z1ZFuFuq2+5uMeV3TiRbF85Y/8Pt7sDl8I2nDFchrVIjZA E4SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WZhwwe1ayuPVA69e1TT1fIctA9s5h7IHaWzs8kdMHTq+JTUAh RGGFbohS38JIElfsWEUi9vI4GZjtCl7NnlAW9sjGQJaEAFSc6jFbBkBKR66/e24xchf2tTripRI 6HDFs9UkeNkCGFDJ+qdAeJPN3 X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4757:: with SMTP id k23mr8914739qtp.105.1599760082024; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4757:: with SMTP id k23mr8914716qtp.105.1599760081800; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ruby.lyude.net (pool-108-49-102-102.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [108.49.102.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm6910440qkm.16.2020.09.10.10.48.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] V2: Currently, DRM get the capability of the mst hub only from DP_DPCD_REV and get the slower speed even the mst hub can run in the faster speed. From: Lyude Paul To: Koba Ko , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: anthony.wong@canonical.com Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:48:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200910063640.21519-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> References: <20200910063640.21519-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The commit message should be shorter and follow the format other commits for drm usually do, in this case something like: drm/dp_mst: Retrieve extended DPCD caps for topology manager On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 14:36 +0800, Koba Ko wrote: > As per DP-1.3, First check DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT. > If DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT is 1, read the DP_DP13_DPCD_REV to > get the faster capability. > If DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT is 0, read DP_DPCD_REV. > > Signed-off-by: Koba Ko > --- > ChangeLog: > 1. use drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps instead. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > index 7753c718ddf9..293f71d0ae90 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > @@ -3694,8 +3694,8 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, bool ms > ((dpcd_ext & DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT) > ? DP_DP13_DPCD_REV : DP_DPCD_REV); > > /* get dpcd info */ > - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, dpcd_offset, mgr->dpcd, > DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE); > - if (ret != DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE) { > + ret = drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(mgr->aux, mgr->dpcd); > + if (ret < 0) { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to read DPCD\n"); Let's use drm_dbg_kms() here, and let's also print the return code when this fails. With those things fixed: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul > goto out_unlock; > } -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat