Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1298239pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:51:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG+XtTM7SEE7tAVJdeJLC70dG9BJdr6saxuUavLDXYXT11oqsspBYzV88fUhj5TkoFDk/P X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2078:: with SMTP id qp24mr11010917ejb.500.1599763862128; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:51:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599763862; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MPiQTpbBsgq1eB6NJd+fjYcEJ9BH2pmKGFP2bqNgxzAWpP0qWuqbrnufmCcFiObKMt 2yceoqOB2tYzK8gPG5aum4w/Cpp9Hj1mW6Md2q18wA/vSSsl+6wKT+u86DJsH3wkGABe EbKHZlE9HoxBfVAkl6kQgGJoLyAyYZJiuk/gdvWvRS4nKgyLB/NDinFUmQEp0BUdf3pQ MaBAqDmwp1LWPLKsi0gIYamyX0OZzElB96VFTwuVw1HjEeZv/nPU72W/VaXuDqbpcxZI +VW3ybhiBUJ0mxGqbDV2LyU4K1ITnm8LR+VqRjTtKkfLXQ6ZZpp25QYRUG+7IpX4eTXy W8sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=syiK2sXWMQ75NzhJua08Ob3gQ86hoCTelRE7id+AubQ=; b=DVKRz1wLYzQD1Qo8maWupLP1Jsec8hQj3Ou7GBFb25ZYBlradV0W3EKF0WyjEMSEAP rNdhKoA0CTY8rY0TL5qi3z38/IeMQcmaVbdxsbeay+7ueKM+ACbyZ1xkScmEN6Gl94W5 qX0lLvv45pCWmFXtxj3ZY8oovOJHcYt0jNU2kW1TIAy21Ph2BbhFSERjaoFKCtZCh1Np E2zkUroOmzQAkqFAyuQKFuLFqVpT2FMKYGtR4M489Fw2ryBmVSPr8kri/r5eiuWE4JeX 2oHmtbAmkrkcwziTIUJ5kpMvwqLtTluqijb2jbWrbI4JEyw9dTTI3T+4JdE9LHRla407 Kl4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ffqBtVel; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o17si1806084ejg.470.2020.09.10.11.50.38; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ffqBtVel; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725933AbgIJSrS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:47:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55900 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727776AbgIJSqa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:46:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (52.sub-72-107-123.myvzw.com [72.107.123.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27F7E20855; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:46:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599763589; bh=QTmKODHpSxd1w6L2B8OTcSIquNN9NgWDbu2etqTLGqI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=ffqBtVelkI2tCPaUzIc0G4cqiDiK3G2mcNf7CoNfmP8xKoq0gvQy4kTvTXeM0L79/ xLt/jBcmvjwt4VBsDAgq69zzWGNInteuJX983OCeJaE/FfvbH0XPgKnBMIFM/CTt/v 0oNDUAB8ui/MQulryQHq6wbQFsmNRZLepDuI/VKo= Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:46:27 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Rob Herring Cc: Xingxing Su , Bjorn Helgaas , PCI , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Tomlinson , Florian Fainelli , Scott Branden Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks Message-ID: <20200910184627.GA804924@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] > > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: > > > Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, > > > it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. > > > > > > The trace reported by lockdep follows. > > > > > > [ 2.986113] ============================= > > > [ 2.986115] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] > > > [ 2.986116] 5.8.0-rc1+ #11 Not tainted > > > [ 2.986118] ----------------------------- > > > [ 2.986120] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: > > > [ 2.986122] ffffffff80f5ddd8 (console_owner){....}-{3:3}, at: console_unlock+0x284/0x820 > > > [ 2.986130] other info that might help us debug this: > > > [ 2.986132] context-{5:5} > > > [ 2.986134] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: > > > [ 2.986135] #0: 98000007fa03c990 (&dev->mutex){....}-{0:0}, at: device_driver_attach+0x28/0x90 > > > [ 2.986144] #1: ffffffff80fb83a8 (pci_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: pci_bus_write_config_word+0x60/0xb8 > > > [ 2.986152] #2: ffffffff80f5ded0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x1b0/0x3b8 > > > [ 2.986161] stack backtrace: > > > [ 2.986163] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1+ #11 > > > [ 2.986164] Stack : 0000000000001d67 98000000030be9b0 0000000000000001 7b2aba74f6c4785b > > > [ 2.986172] 7b2aba74f6c4785b 0000000000000000 98000007f89cb438 ffffffff80e7dc80 > > > [ 2.986181] 0000000000000001 000000000000000a 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 > > > [ 2.986189] ffffffff80f4e156 fffffffffffffffd ffffffff80cc2d98 fffffffff8000000 > > > [ 2.986197] 0000000024000000 ffffffff80f40000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > [ 2.986205] ffffffff9500cce0 0000000000000000 ffffffff80f50000 ffffffff81546318 > > > [ 2.986213] ffffffff81c4c3c0 0000000000000018 ffffffffbc000000 0000000000000000 > > > [ 2.986221] ffffffff81340000 98000007f89c8000 98000007f89cb430 98000007f8a00000 > > > [ 2.986229] ffffffff806be568 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > [ 2.986237] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff80211c1c 7b2aba74f6c4785b > > > [ 2.986245] ... > > > [ 2.986250] Call Trace: > > > [ 2.986251] [] show_stack+0x9c/0x130 > > > [ 2.986253] [] dump_stack+0xe8/0x150 > > > [ 2.986255] [] __lock_acquire+0x570/0x3250 > > > [ 2.986257] [] lock_acquire+0x118/0x558 > > > [ 2.986259] [] console_unlock+0x2e4/0x820 > > > [ 2.986261] [] vprintk_emit+0x1c0/0x3b8 > > > [ 2.986263] [] dev_vprintk_emit+0x1c8/0x210 > > > [ 2.986265] [] dev_printk_emit+0x3c/0x60 > > > [ 2.986267] [] _dev_warn+0x5c/0x80 > > > [ 2.986269] [] pci_generic_config_write32+0x154/0x160 > > > [ 2.986271] [] pci_bus_write_config_word+0x84/0xb8 > > > [ 2.986273] [] pci_setup_device+0x22c/0x768 > > > [ 2.986275] [] pci_scan_single_device+0xc8/0x100 > > > [ 2.986277] [] pci_scan_slot+0xb0/0x178 > > > [ 2.986279] [] pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x5c/0x370 > > > [ 2.986281] [] pci_scan_root_bus_bridge+0x6c/0xf0 > > > [ 2.986283] [] pci_host_probe+0x1c/0xd8 > > > [ 2.986285] [] platform_drv_probe+0x54/0xb8 > > > [ 2.986287] [] really_probe+0x130/0x388 > > > [ 2.986289] [] driver_probe_device+0x64/0xd8 > > > [ 2.986291] [] device_driver_attach+0x84/0x90 > > > [ 2.986293] [] __driver_attach+0xc8/0x128 > > > [ 2.986295] [] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd8 > > > [ 2.986297] [] bus_add_driver+0x170/0x250 > > > [ 2.986299] [] driver_register+0x84/0x150 > > > [ 2.986301] [] do_one_initcall+0x98/0x458 > > > [ 2.986303] [] kernel_init_freeable+0x2c0/0x36c > > > [ 2.986305] [] kernel_init+0x10/0x128 > > > [ 2.986307] [] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/access.c | 3 --- > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > index 79c4a2e..b3fc164 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/access.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > @@ -160,9 +160,6 @@ int pci_generic_config_write32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, > > > * write happen to have any RW1C (write-one-to-clear) bits set, we > > > * just inadvertently cleared something we shouldn't have. > > > */ > > > - dev_warn_ratelimited(&bus->dev, "%d-byte config write to %04x:%02x:%02x.%d offset %#x may corrupt adjacent RW1C bits\n", > > > - size, pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, > > > - PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn), where); > > > > We just changed this printk (see [1]), but I think we still have this > > lockdep problem even after Mark's change. So I guess we need another > > think about this. > > > > Maybe we can print something when registering pci_ops that use > > pci_generic_config_write32()? > > That was my suggestion, but as Mark pointed out that doesn't work if > pci_generic_config_write32 is wrapped (which is 4 out of 8 cases). > > Also, 3 of the cases are only for the root bus (bridge). Are 32-bit > writes to a bridge going to cause problems? For xgene, interestingly, > with DT _write32 is needed, but for ACPI it is not (only _read32). I > think xgene is practically dead though a few people still have > systems, but likely xgene with DT is really dead. The ECAM case was > for QCom server which is also pretty much dead. SA1100 nano-engine is > really old and something only a few people have at most (Russell > King). So ignoring all those, we're left with just loongson and iproc. > Maybe just remove the warning? Sigh, removing it sounds like the best option.