Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power
 management
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, aford@beaconembedded.com,
        hns@goldelico.com, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200819125925.2119434-1-aford173@gmail.com>
 <20200910200152.72cc5d9f@aktux>
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <4770327e-84fb-0543-097c-6525d762a01f@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:14:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200910200152.72cc5d9f@aktux>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/09/2020 20:01, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:59:23 -0500
> Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The bandgap sensor can be idled when the processor is too, but it
>> isn't currently being done, so the power consumption of OMAP3
>> boards can elevated if the bangap sensor is enabled.
>>
>> This patch attempts to use some additional power management
>> to idle the clock to the bandgap when not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> ---
>> V2: Fix issue where variable stating the suspend mode isn't being
>>     properly set and cleared.
>>
> hmm, it is not in linux-next. Can we expect that for v5.10?

The reason I did not pick this patch is because lkp reported an error on it.

https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=159788472017308&w=2


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog