Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1321591pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJrWxJGlEhRWV14yEshwjnpLLUqYQotYOCapvwnYjZluhgd9btUiWXYnIQM0kEiG0U/0NV X-Received: by 2002:a50:99d5:: with SMTP id n21mr11006284edb.88.1599766005740; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599766005; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RJ1FMxc/BJz304lC9EWwFa3awtZrAQi6XhgUT4ze6bxIEM1Tr5zhK9d2/hwlo+XG/Y 7t11+wBQEa4r/QCjYOtAWllHtosGMZUMkbQM56Ac5eXMc6QpQUoVioOEMT+ChpLt5EAn qKowzIjONj3bwJ7mirS1d0oNCWVa/BRB5+SGNGJuXskFDLL+GBypKCxQLFyehQ5jk9o3 9UF9aBmpdz7glPW7ld91G/QA5kzjmYrAOO6F57BVJWYOFxLPU15IkYByXSpr+Y6nf/es x12U7rrdjZqqwjrAZa8IolNJ5Y1XsjoOQW1b9ANAAOPUYYwAqTO2GYuibuuo5NwBfi9J tJag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=9w45VZWOTWHRpHJKDRnd2gj0CH4v1KqsTw3tcnUZHeI=; b=XbnW7nRhcZVVQQJWUPBfMqdzYEU4YLxjlpcp0InXvETvJ56klMbu9Z4VdJI34l1yi7 rKlcPtv9Vj439cC/WLUGGmnvIiW4TqDWpUuk7TSIKIfS08BaK2oj+IXee0Rjq2jUSEDw VFUPwEc/HIQWkyOhHcRxIbTR4rjSl388L0idi+pRhqRvnLpfKG7WOUcsW9XbZ8jF6ZRg lnJR+i0YbGs6/v1r76wOPyOjUJw2AgYH1/Ak6UNLfnkmqnQtrUZLXcMI9wbsGp2jBChw DBrsdTAQ6EE/bRngMhiHBkdIwa+Gb0un0xDQjMEh8W7o2GiMQs1D/18VYSW51CtUiq7K l39w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="CYx4+/kv"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10si4275409edv.101.2020.09.10.12.26.22; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="CYx4+/kv"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727947AbgIJTXs (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:23:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45582 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727880AbgIJTWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:22:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com (mail-pg1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E49C061573; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id t14so4775964pgl.10; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:22:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9w45VZWOTWHRpHJKDRnd2gj0CH4v1KqsTw3tcnUZHeI=; b=CYx4+/kvgCH5DjBgR+5x/RJEoBf8ZyZArlM2wlF++zcSk97mDeoQg4AZj9ZgtMY0fe VKNgle+PLT9O607zSr7p/xfATsY0pGsuevFDhoRS5mSGTS/OxJtygbBRTJOaw/1ZJPqf UuICb6s8728K2pmHGALoOUEvBmyruamWGlJ7Pensw0WBXDf0YfzA/NcIPk4+V630KDZH v3hhrg76XL97lTAj2HHEaabt5JN5aAWCSYgoSePq6pF4phrGUAhigPbrTwpCeFBtMZQe Wtb/104t8GRRhT6Vr3RXxu3vzCTPIfvdkR6u6k7Pa9xwWbi8m01WnKwHojCJtxv2PZ4Q 9Jmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9w45VZWOTWHRpHJKDRnd2gj0CH4v1KqsTw3tcnUZHeI=; b=lTQ6Q9h6A50IiqXoJglmL00jYM1pLdwMCptv2oyXq1h6N1O5gu3OZDfCUNoEtMvVZ1 lUHxcE9M3ho8P8CXgQgXMiAwCpOTjY7HmGHikKhRuuaUtuzBldm6nMTJw578RbqgZaB4 F7/xkotIXHbndBmyZW/e2Nnk+U9Lkuathd6Q36ZpzLnA+OC1WkLMKzvwshT/6j51INOB Prqvnk9/7F4Be8za+d9oAgZbXcMRTv8cRYbiJ11gXWAOEP2/R5+NkkknMc4r/LOyfKHQ OXtli8IDws10LNFEW9N4giw6tfkvEEhpRuMvvbUsLVt6hkzl4KRGvwLVUsAK7mdVnTBX wR4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+wS/floWCBDYfn+Dv3t7xpYKszirsAhgSeQffbiwqb0YPXvXt RWZjkM9SFFW+14U4FEvxunQQdtEKvUM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:15c1:b029:13e:d13d:a07a with SMTP id o1-20020a056a0015c1b029013ed13da07amr6964647pfu.17.1599765754634; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.230.30.107] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm6727887pfn.109.2020.09.10.12.22.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Rob Herring , Xingxing Su , Bjorn Helgaas , PCI , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Tomlinson , Scott Branden References: <20200910192005.GA806683@bjorn-Precision-5520> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <100a750c-e359-9836-38be-6a6b5d2917d4@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:22:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200910192005.GA806683@bjorn-Precision-5520> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/10/2020 12:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 9/10/2020 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: >>>>>> Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, >>>>>> it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. >>>>>> >>>>>> The trace reported by lockdep follows. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.986113] ============================= >>>>>> [ 2.986115] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] >>>>>> [ 2.986116] 5.8.0-rc1+ #11 Not tainted >>>>>> [ 2.986118] ----------------------------- >>>>>> [ 2.986120] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: >>>>>> [ 2.986122] ffffffff80f5ddd8 (console_owner){....}-{3:3}, at: console_unlock+0x284/0x820 >>>>>> [ 2.986130] other info that might help us debug this: >>>>>> [ 2.986132] context-{5:5} >>>>>> [ 2.986134] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: >>>>>> [ 2.986135] #0: 98000007fa03c990 (&dev->mutex){....}-{0:0}, at: device_driver_attach+0x28/0x90 >>>>>> [ 2.986144] #1: ffffffff80fb83a8 (pci_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: pci_bus_write_config_word+0x60/0xb8 >>>>>> [ 2.986152] #2: ffffffff80f5ded0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x1b0/0x3b8 >>>>>> [ 2.986161] stack backtrace: >>>>>> [ 2.986163] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1+ #11 >>>>>> [ 2.986164] Stack : 0000000000001d67 98000000030be9b0 0000000000000001 7b2aba74f6c4785b >>>>>> [ 2.986172] 7b2aba74f6c4785b 0000000000000000 98000007f89cb438 ffffffff80e7dc80 >>>>>> [ 2.986181] 0000000000000001 000000000000000a 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 >>>>>> [ 2.986189] ffffffff80f4e156 fffffffffffffffd ffffffff80cc2d98 fffffffff8000000 >>>>>> [ 2.986197] 0000000024000000 ffffffff80f40000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >>>>>> [ 2.986205] ffffffff9500cce0 0000000000000000 ffffffff80f50000 ffffffff81546318 >>>>>> [ 2.986213] ffffffff81c4c3c0 0000000000000018 ffffffffbc000000 0000000000000000 >>>>>> [ 2.986221] ffffffff81340000 98000007f89c8000 98000007f89cb430 98000007f8a00000 >>>>>> [ 2.986229] ffffffff806be568 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >>>>>> [ 2.986237] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff80211c1c 7b2aba74f6c4785b >>>>>> [ 2.986245] ... >>>>>> [ 2.986250] Call Trace: >>>>>> [ 2.986251] [] show_stack+0x9c/0x130 >>>>>> [ 2.986253] [] dump_stack+0xe8/0x150 >>>>>> [ 2.986255] [] __lock_acquire+0x570/0x3250 >>>>>> [ 2.986257] [] lock_acquire+0x118/0x558 >>>>>> [ 2.986259] [] console_unlock+0x2e4/0x820 >>>>>> [ 2.986261] [] vprintk_emit+0x1c0/0x3b8 >>>>>> [ 2.986263] [] dev_vprintk_emit+0x1c8/0x210 >>>>>> [ 2.986265] [] dev_printk_emit+0x3c/0x60 >>>>>> [ 2.986267] [] _dev_warn+0x5c/0x80 >>>>>> [ 2.986269] [] pci_generic_config_write32+0x154/0x160 >>>>>> [ 2.986271] [] pci_bus_write_config_word+0x84/0xb8 >>>>>> [ 2.986273] [] pci_setup_device+0x22c/0x768 >>>>>> [ 2.986275] [] pci_scan_single_device+0xc8/0x100 >>>>>> [ 2.986277] [] pci_scan_slot+0xb0/0x178 >>>>>> [ 2.986279] [] pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x5c/0x370 >>>>>> [ 2.986281] [] pci_scan_root_bus_bridge+0x6c/0xf0 >>>>>> [ 2.986283] [] pci_host_probe+0x1c/0xd8 >>>>>> [ 2.986285] [] platform_drv_probe+0x54/0xb8 >>>>>> [ 2.986287] [] really_probe+0x130/0x388 >>>>>> [ 2.986289] [] driver_probe_device+0x64/0xd8 >>>>>> [ 2.986291] [] device_driver_attach+0x84/0x90 >>>>>> [ 2.986293] [] __driver_attach+0xc8/0x128 >>>>>> [ 2.986295] [] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd8 >>>>>> [ 2.986297] [] bus_add_driver+0x170/0x250 >>>>>> [ 2.986299] [] driver_register+0x84/0x150 >>>>>> [ 2.986301] [] do_one_initcall+0x98/0x458 >>>>>> [ 2.986303] [] kernel_init_freeable+0x2c0/0x36c >>>>>> [ 2.986305] [] kernel_init+0x10/0x128 >>>>>> [ 2.986307] [] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/pci/access.c | 3 --- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c >>>>>> index 79c4a2e..b3fc164 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/access.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c >>>>>> @@ -160,9 +160,6 @@ int pci_generic_config_write32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, >>>>>> * write happen to have any RW1C (write-one-to-clear) bits set, we >>>>>> * just inadvertently cleared something we shouldn't have. >>>>>> */ >>>>>> - dev_warn_ratelimited(&bus->dev, "%d-byte config write to %04x:%02x:%02x.%d offset %#x may corrupt adjacent RW1C bits\n", >>>>>> - size, pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, >>>>>> - PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn), where); >>>>> >>>>> We just changed this printk (see [1]), but I think we still have this >>>>> lockdep problem even after Mark's change. So I guess we need another >>>>> think about this. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe we can print something when registering pci_ops that use >>>>> pci_generic_config_write32()? >>>> >>>> That was my suggestion, but as Mark pointed out that doesn't work if >>>> pci_generic_config_write32 is wrapped (which is 4 out of 8 cases). >>>> >>>> Also, 3 of the cases are only for the root bus (bridge). Are 32-bit >>>> writes to a bridge going to cause problems? For xgene, interestingly, >>>> with DT _write32 is needed, but for ACPI it is not (only _read32). I >>>> think xgene is practically dead though a few people still have >>>> systems, but likely xgene with DT is really dead. The ECAM case was >>>> for QCom server which is also pretty much dead. SA1100 nano-engine is >>>> really old and something only a few people have at most (Russell >>>> King). So ignoring all those, we're left with just loongson and iproc. >>>> Maybe just remove the warning? >>> >>> Sigh, removing it sounds like the best option. >> >> Given that we have to go by a list of drivers, how about we add another >> pci_bus_flags_t flag to indicate 32-bit configuration space accessors are >> used and key off that bit to issue the warning? > > I think that's basically what Mark's patch does: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=pci/enumeration&id=92ff4b49c2a9 Yes indeed, not enough coffee, clearly. > > But of course we still have to deal with the lockdep problem. > -- Florian