Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1333145pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyktYhoHeSlsPSTTpozPYkVdOhFUxA43rrzGJIwTdvT6EcGxef+FL5nnwQau/TeS+r+cICp X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee14:: with SMTP id g20mr11614464eds.32.1599767153192; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599767153; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ATK2Y7y6fRf4soTbIbP20EhEE+5mNYmjerBwvVQAfhafQoMl/MBoQgymDu+5wz+1QD uKOdcaS03QCSvCsHSiBVm9EhrVDrrUW8erYFmLe/whYVRohEoHZ43S0gtcAEgQe4u11b 9NH5hmUN5lGW5aW1uPUNs0IjaM85eQevnqAlTHikFpaUCBkYnTId60QFgYleIxaO1Fmc vWL72B5cmZ/LajiU6JYDKiUgVHjvlSrJ5KpYNO4MyQXpcEOLav8wSqlbtKWNyRTtJJbA gjYfcsl+AMT8bGtOulpTme+iaJkH/YSOn3bvdwaA6gxZu0Qng/d4J7oLxrHXpBMlEk0c 383A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Gyczu8EnDtZBCTFYKs+ub/XQS/CL7YFLe6Xs+k7DNCc=; b=IChcpo1wd6Gw4fXfXfD/z/vq+uL08jfTlzHZrqmdRseylkP3oXflPjoOGy87InU7ux ZKNHazDmqnuTsI4IybD31Y6Rl95X5jo/U7q/MrJZ5PyXT3LNMROZKuLudDJJVrk9ARI3 RXhWGkrWlmg8m3Cxb754LFsOZnAtXQQriZzZdqa4GP6EndBzxc1Xo1ccaZwaQhOkm/3O qh0XuhfJ7AIoT6GgGoBBtGc/PKs+BPceZR96uD1SPYhZ7C9KS94rznXxe9936wKTx2Wt 9Ub5YJvQ2ci/lisL6lYi5YvrYbrtzrjPN+JQWqw00yw5YH2ICX0RIYpYhojk5QMXy+1Y fEBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=cv+Tr1pN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y17si4147218ejq.737.2020.09.10.12.45.30; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=cv+Tr1pN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728041AbgIJTmA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:42:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51500 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726848AbgIJTlj (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:41:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (52.sub-72-107-123.myvzw.com [72.107.123.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 442A721556; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:41:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599766899; bh=xVKQeh6vK/bSUtAb8QmMQzYllSypqGLdxdvE0zPLxSU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=cv+Tr1pNNaxP2eOUGtBsg7HrYjYKSN2v7JvR6yNY5z7cMXtbl9CCyZJKDi6BZl4eb jKIfC7kah7XB2mcYTWUlU7AXuxJzQaxUgP+gmvu7KW9x0vBn8Xg01KQnA+5QkY+8L4 B1pH9L/kzJQUVLSeqKTyzh3q3g7hhGfqaUNaQ8vE= Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:41:38 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Tiezhu Yang Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Xuefeng Li Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI/portdrv: No need to call pci_disable_device() during shutdown Message-ID: <20200910194138.GA808043@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1599294806-13889-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 04:33:26PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > After commit 745be2e700cd ("PCIe: portdrv: call pci_disable_device > during remove") and commit cc27b735ad3a ("PCI/portdrv: Turn off PCIe > services during shutdown"), it also calls pci_disable_device() during > shutdown, this seems unnecessary, so just remove it. I would like to get rid of the portdrv completely by folding its functionality into the PCI core itself, so there would be no portdrv probe or remove. Does this solve a problem? If not, I'm inclined to just leave it as-is for now. But if it fixes something, we should do the fix, of course. > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 1 - > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > index 50a9522..1991aca 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ void pcie_port_device_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > device_for_each_child(&dev->dev, NULL, remove_iter); > pci_free_irq_vectors(dev); > - pci_disable_device(dev); > } > > /** > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > index 3a3ce40..cab37a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > @@ -143,6 +143,18 @@ static void pcie_portdrv_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) > } > > pcie_port_device_remove(dev); > + pci_disable_device(dev); > +} > + > +static void pcie_portdrv_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + if (pci_bridge_d3_possible(dev)) { > + pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev); > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&dev->dev); > + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&dev->dev); > + } > + > + pcie_port_device_remove(dev); > } > > static pci_ers_result_t pcie_portdrv_error_detected(struct pci_dev *dev, > @@ -211,7 +223,7 @@ static struct pci_driver pcie_portdriver = { > > .probe = pcie_portdrv_probe, > .remove = pcie_portdrv_remove, > - .shutdown = pcie_portdrv_remove, > + .shutdown = pcie_portdrv_shutdown, > > .err_handler = &pcie_portdrv_err_handler, > > -- > 2.1.0 >