Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1462229pxk; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:27:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhPg8s5mq15Koc/ep+ZP0mg7V7R9BEKG0QL+u8w25zYVwZTLfC5LM1CZ3KRCO5jwVthXun X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1b11:: with SMTP id o17mr12152848ejg.67.1599780455210; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:27:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599780455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KE+OnSztW7dvC9g8PCAvnIwwdGOrT6SLyEsnoy4Jo3ys0Rny9YX6aVOjhwN3o9NsRj 7f/lDZ5huRUtWF+mGZZh3FSLFh5cb5lrAETFhZhavaYeq70lYODlKmpMJ61vxbNFhxCs XioDX19qsroq+r6vjQCE64SblALlUCSFfK+y1GV7uELqLbcujlG8+4E001t7/9DwCFyT /fkeAK5zb38Ix776rNlGBZjnNrRrV8Ue9AZ0EMgLOdWdx4UToGRLVcihUOwSObxMUnxf U18eH3cV3Ax/I8kNjbRPZo2VXdofLkezR8SH+7NYxFY7PpTH3MRqf+4c3O8AuukFtKyZ VAhA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=VZlWTPzwnFebLtigNccl4tjbrW0gsqr46B59u1z1FFA=; b=EPDzQvlPASjTo4vyyLjncOUO1mUcl6WqlfPiwt8sUfpv39Q6gmvoyyBF/0AwUIsmC1 bROgBa1Npz6H2jDQL3lOULo3xzbefWlgsl4BL6E/4tWR3r/Tk9lclnPdeKyvYBToWURh MMcsRefkyTjbz+rsZk/1ZQ9osg3MWlDWPVjklYRlt6uPP1n9RSSb5LRzaDT1l3zhkMUS 9yhRu6agQGF4GdsJRtdYdwBAPG4Bs0LP4a4OvA1bv3MhxctS6Oq5Kqar7DhGL/7MmmgZ /e0LPKMv7z/aJSEeo3KfCAGTeRyHNJ68Y9/JjUltEYNvA1Zy1d/0RT3jyBNAuORAWw3c pjqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=dOA0UGdZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u17si88408edr.266.2020.09.10.16.26.51; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=dOA0UGdZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725320AbgIJXXp (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:23:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbgIJXXk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:23:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7AF7C061757 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id g29so5221336pgl.2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:23:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=VZlWTPzwnFebLtigNccl4tjbrW0gsqr46B59u1z1FFA=; b=dOA0UGdZffykEDVFV5x73+yCWBWIlUrVtj4MMIscHn4LpaVFku+Lb/PL6gRkxnm1vZ YQtquyZNoDWaqY4lEV/VozXDLalb++kiyQoq03ZBSmrlGx9ZTcBYZ0jBlZcmIRKCJW1D s4/HOiAjmIJqYmvwrRbh9IMsuVVPfZWurgnSg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=VZlWTPzwnFebLtigNccl4tjbrW0gsqr46B59u1z1FFA=; b=IYCm1In/6s32hltFLdar1wKu+axhDnwbEBGMZnGoogWVc8pB+dTOCAm5xURmBal4rg K2nZ3riDF8JMEGay+Lqu/zKwKWbRyuDohiP87WQi6MqhmNqsNSSZbmXHBWCBcgByP6Cy f6axXJ9Tk7AS4QTYPPJ//0H7Q1mrnTtp/pypm42s8Z7StsI6whLOvyCamYAy2EHanjrT BgFwFmQmdh//Nr38uLig9LcuJzKbJH9TilACBCpS3jkNYN3XPI5DTst98nXty1+sgnua gbUUE5PKGjORfals62iaOSTkwi18O4009bfvrygzEG/Gbazz53EdnIhxFnn+KOCtXXDK buww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Qfl5yWBeekynfx89e5D6jF24DJCXVUi0df9rOsuNpBE8wiPIE /0nY6yjSZJx6wb1kMklig1q7aC6QXZgUo/q2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:fe8c:b029:d0:cbe1:e74a with SMTP id x12-20020a170902fe8cb02900d0cbe1e74amr8174123plm.37.1599780218173; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm150436pfp.214.2020.09.10.16.23.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:23:36 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: John Wood , Matthew Wilcox , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Viro , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Luis Chamberlain , Iurii Zaikin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] security/fbfam: Add the api to manage statistics Message-ID: <202009101618.2D05F2588@keescook> References: <20200910202107.3799376-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20200910202107.3799376-3-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200910202107.3799376-3-keescook@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:21:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > From: John Wood > > Create a statistical data structure to hold all the necessary > information involve in a fork brute force attack. This info is a > timestamp for the first fork or execve and the number of crashes since > then. Moreover, due to this statitistical data will be shared between > different tasks, a reference counter it is necessary. > > For a correct management of an attack it is also necessary that all the > tasks hold statistical data. The same statistical data needs to be > shared between all the tasks that hold the same memory contents or in > other words, between all the tasks that have been forked without any > execve call. > > When a forked task calls the execve system call, the memory contents are > set with new values. So, in this scenario the parent's statistical data > no need to be share. Instead, a new statistical data structure must be > allocated to start a new cycle. > > The statistical data that every task holds needs to be clear when a task > exits. Due to this data is shared across multiples tasks, the reference > counter is useful to free the previous allocated data only when there > are not other pointers to the same data. Or in other words, when the > reference counter reaches zero. > > So, based in all the previous information add the api to manage all the > commented cases. > > Also, add to the struct task_struct a new field to point to the > statitistical data related to an attack. This way, all the tasks will > have access to this information. > > Signed-off-by: John Wood I think patch 1 should be merged into this one since the former doesn't really *do* anything. ;) > --- > include/fbfam/fbfam.h | 18 +++++ > include/linux/sched.h | 4 + > security/Makefile | 4 + > security/fbfam/Makefile | 2 + > security/fbfam/fbfam.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 191 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/fbfam/fbfam.h > create mode 100644 security/fbfam/Makefile > create mode 100644 security/fbfam/fbfam.c > > diff --git a/include/fbfam/fbfam.h b/include/fbfam/fbfam.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..b5b7d1127a52 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/fbfam/fbfam.h > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +#ifndef _FBFAM_H_ > +#define _FBFAM_H_ > + > +#include > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_FBFAM > +int fbfam_fork(struct task_struct *child); > +int fbfam_execve(void); > +int fbfam_exit(void); > +#else > +static inline int fbfam_fork(struct task_struct *child) { return 0; } This appears to map well to LSM hook "task_alloc". > +static inline int fbfam_execve(void) { return 0; } This appears to map well to LSM hook "bprm_committing_creds". > +static inline int fbfam_exit(void) { return 0; } This appears to map well to LSM hook "task_free". > +#endif > + > +#endif /* _FBFAM_H_ */ > + > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index afe01e232935..00e1aa5e00cd 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -1315,6 +1315,10 @@ struct task_struct { > struct callback_head mce_kill_me; > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FBFAM > + struct fbfam_stats *fbfam_stats; > +#endif This could be part of the task_struct security blob used by LSMs. > + > /* > * New fields for task_struct should be added above here, so that > * they are included in the randomized portion of task_struct. > diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile > index 3baf435de541..36dc4b536349 100644 > --- a/security/Makefile > +++ b/security/Makefile > @@ -36,3 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf/ > # Object integrity file lists > subdir-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity > obj-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity/ > + > +# Object fbfam file lists > +subdir-$(CONFIG_FBFAM) += fbfam > +obj-$(CONFIG_FBFAM) += fbfam/ > diff --git a/security/fbfam/Makefile b/security/fbfam/Makefile > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f4b9f0b19c44 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/fbfam/Makefile > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +obj-$(CONFIG_FBFAM) += fbfam.o > diff --git a/security/fbfam/fbfam.c b/security/fbfam/fbfam.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0387f95f6408 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/fbfam/fbfam.c > @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/** > + * struct fbfam_stats - Fork brute force attack mitigation statistics. > + * @refc: Reference counter. > + * @faults: Number of crashes since jiffies. > + * @jiffies: First fork or execve timestamp. > + * > + * The purpose of this structure is to manage all the necessary information to > + * compute the crashing rate of an application. So, it holds a first fork or > + * execve timestamp and a number of crashes since then. This way the crashing > + * rate in milliseconds per fault can be compute when necessary with the > + * following formula: > + * > + * u64 delta_jiffies = get_jiffies_64() - fbfam_stats::jiffies; > + * u64 delta_time = jiffies64_to_msecs(delta_jiffies); > + * u64 crashing_rate = delta_time / (u64)fbfam_stats::faults; > + * > + * If the fbfam_stats::faults is zero, the above formula can't be used. In this > + * case, the crashing rate is zero. > + * > + * Moreover, since the same allocated structure will be used in every fork > + * since the first one or execve, it's also necessary a reference counter. > + */ > +struct fbfam_stats { > + refcount_t refc; > + unsigned int faults; > + u64 jiffies; > +}; > + > +/** > + * fbfam_new_stats() - Allocation of new statistics structure. > + * > + * If the allocation is successful the reference counter is set to one to > + * indicate that there will be one task that points to this structure. The > + * faults field is initialize to zero and the timestamp for this moment is set. > + * > + * Return: NULL if the allocation fails. A pointer to the new allocated > + * statistics structure if it success. > + */ > +static struct fbfam_stats *fbfam_new_stats(void) > +{ > + struct fbfam_stats *stats = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fbfam_stats), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (stats) { > + refcount_set(&stats->refc, 1); > + stats->faults = 0; > + stats->jiffies = get_jiffies_64(); > + } > + > + return stats; > +} > + > +/* > + * fbfam_fork() - Fork management. > + * @child: Pointer to the child task that will be created with the fork system > + * call. > + * > + * For a correct management of a fork brute force attack it is necessary that > + * all the tasks hold statistical data. The same statistical data needs to be > + * shared between all the tasks that hold the same memory contents or in other > + * words, between all the tasks that have been forked without any execve call. > + * > + * To ensure this, if the current task doesn't have statistical data when forks > + * (only possible in the first fork of the zero task), it is mandatory to > + * allocate a new one. This way, the child task always will share the statistics > + * with its parent. > + * > + * Return: -ENOMEN if the allocation of the new statistics structure fails. > + * Zero otherwise. > + */ > +int fbfam_fork(struct task_struct *child) > +{ > + struct fbfam_stats **stats = ¤t->fbfam_stats; > + > + if (!*stats) { > + *stats = fbfam_new_stats(); > + if (!*stats) > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + refcount_inc(&(*stats)->refc); > + child->fbfam_stats = *stats; > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * fbfam_execve() - Execve management. > + * > + * When a forked task calls the execve system call, the memory contents are set > + * with new values. So, in this scenario the parent's statistical data no need > + * to be share. Instead, a new statistical data structure must be allocated to > + * start a new cycle. This condition is detected when the statistics reference > + * counter holds a value greater than or equal to two (a fork always sets the > + * statistics reference counter to two since the parent and the child task are > + * sharing the same data). > + * > + * However, if the execve function is called immediately after another execve > + * call, althought the memory contents are reset, there is no need to allocate > + * a new statistical data structure. This is possible because at this moment > + * only one task (the task that calls the execve function) points to the data. > + * In this case, the previous allocation is used and only the faults and time > + * fields are reset. > + * > + * Return: -ENOMEN if the allocation of the new statistics structure fails. > + * -EFAULT if the current task doesn't have statistical data. Zero > + * otherwise. > + */ > +int fbfam_execve(void) > +{ > + struct fbfam_stats **stats = ¤t->fbfam_stats; > + > + if (!*stats) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + if (!refcount_dec_not_one(&(*stats)->refc)) { > + /* execve call after an execve call */ > + (*stats)->faults = 0; > + (*stats)->jiffies = get_jiffies_64(); > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* execve call after a fork call */ > + *stats = fbfam_new_stats(); > + if (!*stats) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * fbfam_exit() - Exit management. > + * > + * The statistical data that every task holds needs to be clear when a task > + * exits. Due to this data is shared across multiples tasks, the reference > + * counter is useful to free the previous allocated data only when there are > + * not other pointers to the same data. Or in other words, when the reference > + * counter reaches zero. > + * > + * Return: -EFAULT if the current task doesn't have statistical data. Zero > + * otherwise. > + */ > +int fbfam_exit(void) > +{ > + struct fbfam_stats *stats = current->fbfam_stats; > + > + if (!stats) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&stats->refc)) > + kfree(stats); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > -- > 2.25.1 > Jann mentions some concerns about races, and I'd agree: this doesn't feel right to me, but I've not had a chance to study it yet. I'm concerned about the lifetime management of the stats vs the task hierarchy. -- Kees Cook