Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp364559pxk; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:00:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCJA0ErJiHHLZZro5k866PTRGkfAMtazZHWWUK9q1R3FMpL0+3MyCZ4UUbni5zmSKjEfBS X-Received: by 2002:a50:d304:: with SMTP id g4mr2784091edh.248.1599840023400; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599840023; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uDi2CivDDCQ3strPkkWP0a2mQ21g9CE5aBgf8WrU02+ZTLjsVHCiwjQrJOjEUaqQDx E1Dly01rPduhw00I1nvw18yUfBeUcxYW5cNAGCH/2mBNaAYz8LDNCsjsG2ge5igh9UzQ y5l11NShCBzxksd0jsm7/sRSjDJA9ruAYgwMvRLRNfhsKmVadF+XGtBV08a0YIsuMFLJ eXNZpXlu7LMeBTEaXfc9YILrphOjRKeaIJAYlezyIAsXsJR5Ssdi/cNJ/NssDOPEaDyR Dn9lLtOvRjDS+rhx5r3CuHRli+kSEQC4Vcv+p2rmaKQNlxulDbmDMsNWx6oPkNLovaaS 28HA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=1FwkRUXmqJa9MG4N1eAxD7fFHr3eLhZQDALifMddyC4=; b=dyqsCpMf5DVqzqTWPE/ZDJacl1mV/ZWEAhhdJfRBKxX+D8NuEGuv55/SbsOR8V3/ZY l3egFyORQzayAuOgZGiwHITCp2iuKzuVm5k63hVx77Mia/2tQBVVZ7HL+/AJifk4DFjc OphFAjRS9g7rjOi2t/KZI8t0yivwD2j9lHZZWFr8sR0aNEu4PTt/KzV9UpqTRYXgzvHK Q8rJcjT2kN5Y1q7M9dOdkYJDoMu7utxlWbTjigIZ1+HoRK3Y1eaKeGaZ5BuTBFc2tL7P ZK029SwS+aRenD+5046VKO9FoEPZRM8NWWZ0icNtc/V+Cqe17o0DNtL3pnfmDBUWkEVD OXUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ce12si1455167ejb.719.2020.09.11.08.59.59; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726528AbgIKP6d convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:58:33 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:45647 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726593AbgIKPzW (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:55:22 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.224.148.103 Received: from xps13 (unknown [91.224.148.103]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E07E000F; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:55:14 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Colin King Cc: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: remove redundant assignment to pointer eb Message-ID: <20200911175514.766eeaf1@xps13> In-Reply-To: <20200911102321.22515-1-colin.king@canonical.com> References: <20200911102321.22515-1-colin.king@canonical.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Colin, Colin King wrote on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:23:21 +0100: > From: Colin Ian King > > Pointer eb is being assigned a value that is never read, the assignment > is redundant and can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c > index 58eefa43af14..795dec4483c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c > @@ -1053,7 +1053,6 @@ static int mtdswap_writesect(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev, > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - eb = d->eb_data + (newblock / d->pages_per_eblk); > d->page_data[page] = newblock; > > return 0; Yes it looks unused but perhaps it helps to catch the logic here. This is not a strong disagreement but I'd keep it this way. Let's see what other maintainers think. Thanks, Miquèl