Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp601430pxk; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:45:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhHYwqqBKDrUlINJ9b9u7GPgTla38HORVS9GrbgKbYUUx2MmdkspS5f1ZK92F5g8PHETOF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce3b:: with SMTP id sd27mr4078160ejb.433.1599864350034; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:45:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599864350; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hhIKhpyiotcakDie80w2s02o5o5nkMK1lmfZfjE5uY3/Eh7Tbhf/rKWNm/7Q+paCyB ECpqhjJPq5sgxMQJCZU/kgnbDl8ON178v/MKzLWhZ53eJZ/L6PcYYn3zQ5SOWPWGQeXn mrthj6B+BIga33323Q1CX2D4j9DJUwa+TViOF4X37j3l4LjauE95m89Xrg1qc7PGl3cB Ekft48/cOAGS0peTc7f4s+ySQ1oiNMGgeZui+AMkLXKpF3Vwm6rvKolzkhujTD6HdqHc 2bOGvKcX/2r7gLKEQ6cnhZy8W+b2kACACE9tTIcg4BVGBbW96x1vtbC68hAcsH/dExhj Acpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=u+WhBADY6qVJWkQ3xRM3bDy/SBlYQIzy5ZdNwaCGMPo=; b=o/z8WHGzPsXlKqt5y7yZBcmtisDUFu/ijNezs+7MUthPaMY3bENHjbC+DD4IHxi/tC KWvTx/CwhwKu48hYsTZoK1/IR47WSGTcF03No+i7yHXNEx5XnjXA/cDM8zJxlgAngpnK a/P4as4wMpNkJF0LWiYXlxnhP597AU1gwsBcZqib1NGBiqUjWXnBm2i0tbfsSim2sLlT arvtNflGmT1+ttOTjJZvpxDj6K1UL27SUu25yrUXsiNNxwdZEa+kkf3VCry1a8ATCatg Y6QwSDM0b84S/y7cjNGE/13aHW6FPLV5r9vg1hPZORcVIxtyfaNlMFwfMNHiIsfNMoTx 2fFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Vd6T5UxR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k3si2066632ejx.102.2020.09.11.15.45.27; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Vd6T5UxR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725909AbgIKWow (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:44:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725893AbgIKWor (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:44:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf42.google.com (mail-qv1-xf42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49220C061573; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf42.google.com with SMTP id h1so6025279qvo.9; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u+WhBADY6qVJWkQ3xRM3bDy/SBlYQIzy5ZdNwaCGMPo=; b=Vd6T5UxRIdx5jTi/U0KU/8IsFPJn+d/lu1Rm2NRQqLFvakL1U7maewPdM/lewBZIBf 3JlMLhMrGiLuqhfjC65xkDCyKXeVytlPJRK7J9HAiMm+TJRRlqOh/2R5NiUtCSLvaJT3 OX9MD+J6eZXUr4IsDcH8JIThEv6bGpk9DePXSYqgZ0fFHA2XzxH5/EzeFwS12bSgIban T08PKKO3K2bSfLHbeNo9gH9hE41A48jpwozy4ttMKVyIvb+/HLVMTpx4JvRk9+nDgf9B 24/5RuG4MXhn2RwEKraI50vOGj06UnXe33AFayZdWAj1277lIwCEUDN7UFQUtNdRLJDq 7fww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u+WhBADY6qVJWkQ3xRM3bDy/SBlYQIzy5ZdNwaCGMPo=; b=AOfWNZHNCNCW/2g4fQyAW+Ls9E8oUcG591Ijb3dwp0fpUyeSw4Jj2agZdyNp1/sC5n eN+TtV4I+t9JeTvzBljvqY14JDy1M7u/vNuGP8lX3rhSOVk2I5JpPBW35PlmuanRXJ4D bmhA5gYr1vHBlEDBWaTWLh8LImj+qihn98LrxjdxAnVdsymJsFjwV8T7YWyC5xpYyDgn LTrrWVdbiqCXwm8j5FuqcHCLZfTQn12st1LE3VP+v6kHBG1/H4rnGpb++YTo/+UHGNQO DCSwyQet/uGPZr/Ydh2FH0V3c/shLo0B4XSTKfA+LI3J9fc3yAdp+kLmIKcNsEltAvRP Kt5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hi2SFqhzaY5jsKIKNcviszXDwNpJAUBAv9vQ0Fz2/unfv5vyy xHYqCMOvgVemCijit5rAr4PNlarpYRtqvw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fa07:: with SMTP id q7mr4218336qvn.41.1599864286486; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:95ac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j31sm4681290qtc.33.2020.09.11.15.44.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:44:44 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 block/for-next] blk-iocost: fix divide-by-zero in transfer_surpluses() Message-ID: <20200911224444.GB865564@mtj.thefacebook.com> References: <20200911170746.GG4295@mtj.thefacebook.com> <20200911224049.GA865564@mtj.thefacebook.com> <59987f54-47fc-766f-0667-5a90daca0b1a@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59987f54-47fc-766f-0667-5a90daca0b1a@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:43:18PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/11/20 4:40 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Conceptually, root_iocg->hweight_donating must be less than WEIGHT_ONE but > > all hweight calculations round up and thus it may end up >= WEIGHT_ONE > > triggering divide-by-zero and other issues. Bound the value to avoid > > surprises. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Fixes: e08d02aa5fc9 ("blk-iocost: implement Andy's method for donation weight updates") > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > --- > > Jens, I was flipping between doing max_t(, 1) over the whole divider and > > doing min_t(, WEIGHT_ONE - 1) for hweight_donating. I thought that I as > > testing after the last change but it obviously wasn't and the previous patch > > doesn't compile due to missing type argument. Can you please apply this > > patch instead? I can send an incremental patch if that'd be better. My > > apologies. > > Sure, I replaced it. BTW, you had two signed-off-by's in there. Yeah, sloppy all around. Sorry about that. Gotta slow down more when posting oh-shit-I-fucked-up stuff. Thanks. -- tejun