Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 00:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20060531.004953.91760903.davem@davemloft.net>
To: bidulock@openss7.org
Cc: draghuram@rocketmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060531014540.A1319@openss7.org>
References: <20060530235525.A30563@openss7.org>
	<20060531.001027.60486156.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20060531014540.A1319@openss7.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 647
Lines: 15

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 01:45:40 -0600

> It might sound like I'm complaining, but I'm not.  The
> function works for me.  But from a purist point of view,
> the hash function is not as efficient as it could be and
> there is room for improvement.

For sure and there are plans afoot to move over to
dynamic table sizing and the Jenkins hash function.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/