Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:34:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:34:33 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:3335 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:34:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:34:50 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , Subject: Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c In-Reply-To: <20011030162008.G1340@athlon.random> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:25:46PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > I fully well expect it to be. However, from the point of view of stability > > we *want* to be conservative and correct. If Al had to demonstrate with > > Dave just told you what this change has to do with stability, not sure > why you keep reiterating about stability and correctness. > > But of course going from page flush to the mm flush is fine from my part > too. As Linus noted a few days ago during swapout we're going to block > and reschedule all the time, so the range flush is going to be a noop in Only on architectures where the TLB (or equivalent) is small and only capable of holding entries for one address space at a time. It's simply not true on eg PPC. Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/