Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1975219pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjhZ6D8mMGbmNMHk99BzUSHffRQSs3RPL/G+AHytOK1y5t3vghJxLYza0W7vQnXMdRqp6B X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d78c:: with SMTP id pj12mr13242974ejb.36.1600070301285; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600070301; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kQ50DwgXLAQrizV8TaTLOU4R5NC6MQyPF24gOHU563VS1SDVFVLOfJR+H/His2LgJr RqdffikjM88+94iZxrmbuQ5zk6X0YTXGD3w0WJcEpyG/LT95j/4bD7DGQK0m1JhV91QF h71eboivscppnkfJOZO0eNI4gObPc1RbOsYbe9iRNCh1v4oEYAXOPeKucQYwCA7vg2zj DdvX+5K39iDRJdzTvPDntZdicGyIlkTxjKKnAjvD/4AQWv4AJHOK7Gx7v+9h0UKCNqH+ KJiYurKmdKPPHebZ6Tc+rMcs7cosDTsqG19kZNVAuZI4ZVrV6V9SBr3zcsRDs5G5itjR TP2Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=paEL0PaoPgSc9IEP40AlUAUmQ6zab0AuVqqu/4/YaCI=; b=anEDnowjXsUHOjf4Y586fiLPrMRXRpya+46QURednGyuBPYvnmR4aNsGA/WaGNSRov FjH8s72hgH1LMqU1/2UFSxKYygQ52mCDnw6vmYp7PjCSb2XS2U+k8B6kGWlfKE+NNFre DeS3mcL3iFn5jzw46igw2S8gjMd7nRKCr9eGhaHF5ZcJg3i1s8uyGwnsx2af6hBj5FSi Sg7e3T++uk9jC41IA5BUMygrEjHjWjU9XNx5xFY0DapeMpi8QJGmAYeYTaBipNwSdVbA uneqegFKzrde08Gi4ASULx6QMjg5sOjiYqXl/PmfUiqwWnbiDPXdFKrlCw6KUdSYBj06 co/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jgGN0BrM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mc3si6739717ejb.404.2020.09.14.00.57.59; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jgGN0BrM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726146AbgINH4D (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:56:03 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:25016 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726125AbgINHz4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:55:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E7VhQE069780; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:55:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=paEL0PaoPgSc9IEP40AlUAUmQ6zab0AuVqqu/4/YaCI=; b=jgGN0BrMLz5wPrdbx/zx8UHL5qqk9FN5pS2vevbhM0KSz8a5Uz1IpQjLhHKaIgel+xWq uokUpk/P8YnzZj+1bZ38f0mHNxJcZ607wfioLJiKLFE+hBMyvnlmNJ56lDSRjh3V+QZO rhC2wbgGMLgSO6jUNmRt75DeOcjHQAOJG7RMx/R7QLxD4nuFbhRlglcEGU0Jkf0378JO r4C2/wmec2qYxXI61gId4A4IB+wKXfRy05kOoD62wZhbJjUBDJubr/N8D3YK18+Ttd39 MOSLTKY/VLTRsEtiajakR4bj2XyG6rQL90xUYd6lGmajDGPdtOXxz9kNRapTYcVFD1qC Xw== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33j44qrpks-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:55:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E7r0PO024889; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:51 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33hjgdrcjy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:50 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 08E7sEDt21954918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:54:14 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F027742042; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED54203F; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.3.188]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:55:46 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Harald Freudenberger Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/zcrypt: remove set_fs() invocation in zcrypt device driver Message-ID: <20200914075546.GA11573@osiris> References: <20200910102838.28887-1-freude@linux.ibm.com> <20200911062134.GB21597@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-13_09:2020-09-10,2020-09-13 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=986 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=2 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009140058 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:36:07AM +0200, Harald Freudenberger wrote: > Otherwise how to we provide this fix then ? My recommendation would > be to go the 'usual' way: Commit this s390 internal and then let > this go out with the next kernel merge window when next time Linus > is pulling patches from the s390 subsystem for the 5.10 kernel > development cycle. I will create a "set_fs" topic branch on kernel.org based on vfs.git/base.set_fs and add your patch there and also the rest of s390 set_fs related patches on top of that as soon as things are ready.