Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:58:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 1/8] ALSA; firewire-tascam: exclude Tascam FE-8 from
 detection
Message-ID: <20200914075858.GA1035258@kroah.com>
References: <20200911125421.695645838@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200911125421.771196664@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200914074731.GA11659@amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200914074731.GA11659@amd>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
> > 
> > Tascam FE-8 is known to support communication by asynchronous transaction
> > only. The support can be implemented in userspace application and
> > snd-firewire-ctl-services project has the support. However, ALSA
> > firewire-tascam driver is bound to the model.
> 
> This one is in upstream, but is not marked as such. AFAICT it is
> 0bd8bce897b6697bbc286b8ba473aa0705fe394b.
> 
> Unfortunately it is too late to fix that now.
> 
> This one was scheduled to be released at "Responses should be made by
> Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:54:13 +0000.". But it was released day earlier:
> "Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:42:49 +0200".
> 
> Could you actually follow published schedule?

If all of the reported testing systems come back successful, there is no
need to wait any longer.

> Could you cc me release announcements on pavel@denx.de email?

Will add you to the list, thanks.

greg k-h