Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2015482pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:22:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLeVhfkq4ESFJbfGaakoxVGmZjOlxlPQzvr9EhSXWluy/73q/Uoj97KRdM9PULi69KrQby X-Received: by 2002:aa7:ce19:: with SMTP id d25mr16259425edv.189.1600075351528; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:22:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600075351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u3eqUwp/2n+hva1nYCMGLbHgM85j+8dz4vie/qTAP1vUo4DJE8ROpCl1PC65PXxwBf Kt/UhpHSQqQ0RaEwEVW4umxCVq0C/Cx+FDmhxbQuQt9zCrSJxT6oRGbcOCNALgXP5+Xk cWxAZJ2ghB9FqpeKXFzMk87LJR7PALpp2avZzNnf2ZjJQ2EN2Q5jVsPRpxpokSuzi79o 0T8j1pqz4YJksqxt/VIzP6XVh4TTlrgvdLRGjPcVMiVmbr4pZGdAdmx/G+mkq+9A8Jy1 uuUjIIhdgjSk1G6/Ai0E0romqHe2lqpA6s5+pcVZzN+BpHcLidxe82YpoSJnmlaW1Hfa UISQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=d/VHcnD9+iyee8hVCb0cdHMMI41k5WsqaJSVgsRT7Lo=; b=UbUPGzG42isUaRmdFFJb7PQm8c26MHCngSLZ8sE/SFM0wJtphJo2OIxwf+l8P5BEZh 3S34qdQZeYNTfhW6LOgwq6etpsFqdGAxXqdkTWPW4yguD3y8NjcI8JbTNdVP8gAGm4UN L7aUt/uDCmLLeHQ8blxOSc7bXp1Cfj2r377pc8C0oYm45NGho4ch6RI16voxniF8L4oA /w+4oyyS+AnODY2Ho53M2h3BEwwLHjrnGeTLJWVc3WevCgONAIslxPU0uyBLKvj3rTuv x1iz8l5bQdecdC8R0LUEvUAfVL3iV50qmp1WJBmr7dYUQVIZwStn66Y6F3pmwAeWMR21 xQ5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RBqNUf9O; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3si6839492ejb.156.2020.09.14.02.22.09; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RBqNUf9O; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726230AbgINJT1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 05:19:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:24385 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726184AbgINJTW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 05:19:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600075161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=d/VHcnD9+iyee8hVCb0cdHMMI41k5WsqaJSVgsRT7Lo=; b=RBqNUf9ONv+PYghXBZJLcKWKep5iXhpR3sqw9TXxJrXSr8E0+25+rMpnp95kQ5ZuMdRphl z7fkwafW99KxkNeOBnBp7BOkp2G5YQUsXW+oyh9b+F09q/L2tEGzvc0az6WFcyUmzxgJHK lRylld36M7rbg7AWKwoDHo3Wn40D668= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-461-c2cIyhRdMLK9h6jSH6fkRg-1; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 05:19:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: c2cIyhRdMLK9h6jSH6fkRg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA037104D3E0; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.162] (ovpn-114-162.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.162]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795CA60CD1; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations To: Laurent Dufour , Oscar Salvador Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , nathanl@linux.ibm.com, cheloha@linux.ibm.com, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko References: <20200911134831.53258-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <20200911134831.53258-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <20200914081921.GA15113@linux> <96736256-a0a6-3126-3810-3380532b9621@redhat.com> <9990141a-a4e7-6166-c7aa-e0c1199afa38@linux.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63W5Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAjwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:19:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9990141a-a4e7-6166-c7aa-e0c1199afa38@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.09.20 11:16, Laurent Dufour wrote: > Le 14/09/2020 à 10:31, David Hildenbrand a écrit : >>>> static int register_mem_sect_under_node_hotplug(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >>>> void *arg) >>>> { >>>> const int nid = *(int *)arg; >>>> int ret; >>>> >>>> /* Hotplugged memory has no holes and belongs to a single node. */ >>>> mem_blk->nid = nid; >>>> ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, >>>> &mem_blk->dev.kobj, >>>> kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); >>>> if (ret) >>>> returnr et; >>>> return sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&mem_blk->dev.kobj, >>>> &node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, >>>> kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj)); >>>> >>>> } >>>> >>>> Cleaner, right? :) No unnecessary checks. >>> >>> I tend to agree here, I like more a simplistic version for hotplug. >>> >> >> ... and while we're at it, we should rename register_mem_sect_under_node >> to something like "register_memory_block_under_node" - "section" is a >> legacy leftover here. >> >> We could factor out both sysfs_create_link_nowarn() calls into something >> like "do_register_memory_block_under_node" or similar, to minimize code >> duplication. >> >>>> One could argue if link_mem_section_hotplug() would be better than passing around the context. >>> >>> I am not sure if I would duplicate the code there. >>> We could just pass the pointer of the function we want to call to >>> link_mem_sections? either register_mem_sect_under_node_hotplug or >>> register_mem_sect_under_node_early? >>> Would not that be clean and clear enough? >> >> I don't particularly like passing around function pointers where it can >> be avoided (e.g., here exporting 3 functions now instead 1). Makes the >> interface harder to get IMHO. But I don't really care about that >> interface, easy to change later on. >> > > This would lead to the following. > > Do everyone agree? > > diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c > index 508b80f6329b..444808a7c9b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/node.c > +++ b/drivers/base/node.c > @@ -761,9 +761,32 @@ static int __ref get_nid_for_pfn(unsigned long pfn) > return pfn_to_nid(pfn); > } > > +static int do_register_memory_block_under_node(int nid, > + struct memory_block *mem_blk) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + /* > + * If this memory block spans multiple nodes, we only indicate > + * the last processed node. > + */ > + mem_blk->nid = nid; > + > + ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, > + &mem_blk->dev.kobj, > + kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&mem_blk->dev.kobj, > + &node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, > + kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj)); > + > +} > + > /* register memory section under specified node if it spans that node */ > -static int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > - void *arg) > +static int register_mem_block_under_node_early(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > + void *arg) > { > unsigned long memory_block_pfns = memory_block_size_bytes() / PAGE_SIZE; > unsigned long start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); > @@ -785,38 +808,35 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct > memory_block *mem_blk, > } > > /* > - * We need to check if page belongs to nid only for the boot > - * case, during hotplug we know that all pages in the memory > - * block belong to the same node. > + * We need to check if page belongs to nid only at the boot > + * case because node's ranges can be interleaved. > */ > - if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) { > - page_nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn); > - if (page_nid < 0) > - continue; > - if (page_nid != nid) > - continue; > - } > - > - /* > - * If this memory block spans multiple nodes, we only indicate > - * the last processed node. > - */ > - mem_blk->nid = nid; > + page_nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn); > + if (page_nid < 0) > + continue; > + if (page_nid != nid) > + continue; > > - ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, > - &mem_blk->dev.kobj, > - kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); > + ret = do_register_memory_block_under_node(nid, mem_blk); > if (ret) > return ret; You have to do an unconditional return ret; here AFAIKS. For me this looks much better. Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb