Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2100655pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:59:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmWkJwZJOormBzGIYO6ib2sflYrpFFLnUOWh5R4M84+W5ZEFIEKjObQsG/dS2WJWdfpQLe X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d417:: with SMTP id z23mr16198433edq.62.1600084785354; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:59:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600084785; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=m34l+0s6f04cFx8zRM9ADoycniBYWhJaG5AKFnHI/OLddzTk/h+Db5CaO8X1ba5D1P XxamFZ5tTdD5Mxm/L/79A6vKcl1/6ubAkeRPYsq1BeUUsn0wVa/oQOXDv6BkNpkScb5+ SXIlXc78O318jZm0WDKOjVzSQnadNu4EM+4s2YfWOlIRka9lGOuefg3/U1XVq/iTCOaO tWAG8AVtOnwGGNGrhLot/igZ66ZVDSPPG8DKQ+2UsQ9AM4hsXu0LglCPZv95X8+3tSav Nl2CiiLLUh/70PunDhpk+k+2MC84zRvmMP+UuSpCvPY7E4qwSrwnomAIc610/dhmWvH9 G9Tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=hVctvVnEQDm46Jm3XKV/WTVkUbioAqpNFIq60oMOVeU=; b=Kx/WXh13t2VrE5f5FzgFAt7ae+hNr+hrZwJAvWtJW9mXzVRCrNlxPRERG23cX+mRY5 02db7C1BBfQPmH4aY8zbp56pIrSf913ooZddhPb14bJg9mVs1vTKJvhCWVpGoR5OSjO0 6RDbvxJTK5kloGTXCwGmp0fXTKUxE22ac1nliyzMdfzGLxcMmS29zvfqqneIVGhvozPr 4c9NQbRe7xFioIfsnyDLcl6TmuQFgyqzeQKxUA0sKTOZRffblS6VnWGdoHlFOKdYdtGy 3oET5rlM6zJG0+UvmPySnAxuFMs7KUru6vrEWyYc543rkHUiSMZSy5Aty0EHq+wTV+g2 RyyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=QGZghH66; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ce12si6728029ejb.719.2020.09.14.04.59.23; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=QGZghH66; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726072AbgINLq4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:46:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726112AbgINLmO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:42:14 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF44C061788 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:42:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=hVctvVnEQDm46Jm3XKV/WTVkUbioAqpNFIq60oMOVeU=; b=QGZghH66ot7xadcJLkzNIDQbja 0eLsXJVvZkEgQf3dwziAR/kFj3tfsQ8sheRuGVDDdkpYWzZw8Ch6PBP8J8A8GlpWWd5yQyDSd9s+b ObsQuph448tK15VqNmZnkI6+TtnM5+zIxDkm/pYI8Uo+Jc9cmILJIwj6jkupL36nMNHMvAkdqxs6S jduuRmOz9us1eWnF1Zxx/qFJ5lsT+0WMZX2IlwpmlnU5T4JUqHwj4Vx9VONLs4pP2TTXn7FSbeGWJ oDW1mymXyMlye6RHiFfGA0TxtgtYGrzQQqOic+6PFLUBthhzyrcWcvWN7hlpcB33UlQfWDqdQ1AGl OBaXVIag==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHmrz-0006dy-Vw; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:42:04 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35C7303A02; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:42:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D3C962B09E055; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:42:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:42:02 +0200 From: peterz@infradead.org To: Vincent Guittot Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com, pauld@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Improve fairness between cfs tasks Message-ID: <20200914114202.GQ1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200914100340.17608-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200914100340.17608-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:03:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Vincent Guittot (4): > sched/fair: relax constraint on task's load during load balance > sched/fair: reduce minimal imbalance threshold > sched/fair: minimize concurrent LBs between domain level > sched/fair: reduce busy load balance interval I see nothing objectionable there, a little more testing can't hurt, but I'm tempted to apply them. Phil, Mel, any chance you can run them through your respective setups?