Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2186118pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz2ksiHr7JcFf79DuTvPYRXH2Z01h9AZN4vQW9kr5V+bvc/d6e8sLrPmHqrnKIYzlri9yf X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:16da:: with SMTP id t26mr14576299ejd.172.1600092123316; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600092123; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=02OKfz1UsxbVTcmSUvevlabpExjsvRhLaUfJZsT/1lYz/YHsCjSOThhjuFoJoRDmmo jcLz8fBeRJOv8LNSVA+VO/24s9CmVN8tbhssYxki7ytXh87Iv+L4Bo9EcDXM4IBDYCyu mWWIafPUOEWrnzm+U+Nv+kjCRyjGUkSJNYoPH3YdpNA7UpgbCqxfMDyq3pG0PYhJm0Ea XQiJtCzabzjXuva7uFfQibu1sdZAtUQ/blwN5flebttRtvACH+C5fjT7KmOR+fn17xFg R+SYLnDjKgXGxwD4/xxKjoanknay1t7szZEbdJ/LfLbSXZ64IkoRQPoJVe0lhD6lyXT6 wL0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=Fu/1GHUDf4AcKJWnq4PI0AJl4nVdBvz984mVLLa8XWI=; b=S8STOFmoSYT2S5fJl/Q7uCKPIimCgvjOnu9BAgQdA1EzTaSbR53f8vedXcRAR1Q6re +Sy6gy00DqlUYcPPNcMGUNi9UAtjewL3DwmYPe3lXotMnxr7dzWw7BVcLeaLvCS2nbUV KnMX19BkwAH2HOk7/MRJ5ysNCcdcJ4XcUpqM9emuaS9GVwA21zG3jKMfKMX2RphAC3+G Tl8xLPYw+sICiwCEGLMsxxTmtH/m/Hx6jRu68A5YhTatkRVyYinMPPFy/TNgMy84rCJY zz99cZF488uRYDHluijxFSzdABVs7z3GHgDkhV1QLVtH92xiz4L2AFbkk7DJ2MR2d6Ap e6Gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FXur+oHt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p9si6668251ejx.463.2020.09.14.07.01.40; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FXur+oHt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726300AbgINN5t (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:57:49 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:34454 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726758AbgINNwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:52:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600091494; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Fu/1GHUDf4AcKJWnq4PI0AJl4nVdBvz984mVLLa8XWI=; b=FXur+oHttylqzUUIdyCox9+t9no2W5Hg02/O1KZXBXsILmO/f8dvL+me4gbOKYXRLPA6S0 FNC7RyrknDa9olelUdO6SZObUVpBpT1Wp9XKxhKTYssqyHzU+b62i9HrETu+pM1fux/Xzk qzc4SLOTz7r/GR3xXBRWzEJyrmlNE00= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-165-FShcX2-SMQ2YvK_dh2FRxA-1; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:51:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: FShcX2-SMQ2YvK_dh2FRxA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 479C884F227; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (ovpn-118-85.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.118.85]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85011002D60; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/memcg: Simplify mem_cgroup_get_max() To: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Shakeel Butt , Chris Down , Roman Gushchin , Yafang Shao References: <20200914024452.19167-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200914024452.19167-3-longman@redhat.com> <20200914114825.GM16999@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Waiman Long Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:51:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200914114825.GM16999@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/14/20 7:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sun 13-09-20 22:44:51, Waiman Long wrote: >> The mem_cgroup_get_max() function used to get memory+swap max from >> both the v1 memsw and v2 memory+swap page counters & return the maximum >> of these 2 values. This is redundant and it is more efficient to just >> get either the v1 or the v2 values depending on which one is currently >> in use. >> >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long >> --- >> mm/memcontrol.c | 20 +++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c >> index 8c74f1200261..ca36bed588d1 100644 >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >> @@ -1633,17 +1633,15 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) >> */ >> unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) >> { >> - unsigned long max; >> - >> - max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); >> - if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) { >> - unsigned long memsw_max; >> - unsigned long swap_max; >> - >> - memsw_max = memcg->memsw.max; >> - swap_max = READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max); >> - swap_max = min(swap_max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages); >> - max = min(max + swap_max, memsw_max); >> + unsigned long max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); >> + >> + if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) { >> + if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) >> + max += min(READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max), >> + (unsigned long)total_swap_pages); >> + } else { /* v1 */ >> + if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) >> + max = memcg->memsw.max; > I agree that making v1 vs. v2 distinction here makes the code more > obvious. But I do not think your code is correct for v1. In a default > state it would lead to max = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX which is not something > we want, right? > > instead you want > max += min(READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.max), total_swap_pages); > You are right, it is a bit tricky for v1. I will change it to     max += min(READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.max) - max, total_swap_pages): Thanks, Longman