Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:08:14 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: Handling ERR within unpin_user_pages()
Message-ID: <20200914140814.GE1221970@ziepe.ca>
References: <1600007555-11650-1-git-send-email-jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
 <20200913145520.GH6583@casper.infradead.org>
 <CAFqt6zYru2VfaBFHEB6+7vMPXUbgX8R5f+GHqxaGjhP8QZEyzw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFqt6zYru2VfaBFHEB6+7vMPXUbgX8R5f+GHqxaGjhP8QZEyzw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 07:20:34AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:25 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 08:02:35PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > It is possible that a buggy caller of unpin_user_pages()
> > > (specially in error handling path) may end up calling it with
> > > npages < 0 which is unnecessary.
> > > @@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ void unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
> > >  {
> > >       unsigned long index;
> > >
> > > +     if (WARN_ON_ONCE(npages < 0))
> > > +             return;
> >
> > But npages is unsigned long.  So it can't be less than zero.
> 
> Sorry, I missed it.
> 
> Then, it means if npages is assigned with -ERRNO by caller, unpin_user_pages()
> may end up calling a big loop, which is unnecessary.

How will a caller allocate memory of the right size and still manage
to call with the wrong npages? Do you have an example of a broken caller?

Jason