Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2217373pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycd2Bi2/XE2YDbPjanvJKf5rREdp/C7BHi3nP/O+B75qswXdKF+XD+x6bGjKgJQFB8pd3S X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:6c9:: with SMTP id n9mr17575634edy.297.1600094320503; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600094320; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pU00/xuNDAGPD5m7AFNah4V2PG1tj4Wv6goQBc8F/woePA07AZQweCZ8cY7/aJ8VYV LHpwH72N9qq00mB/cxzPcdVbCOTGnl6zyMjM4+zt+j0FmJgLrHDzJIvB7Y4lYcQxglMa yK6UMQsHJsSaRxUQ4BuZJuM1I/ZbQ3WHunebJ2lV/zw4bXhHJWvXh83QgWXv5GbZYfqQ 5bjjuwMf3CobKs7MrRU0mo04Ee2PsK0URvFSckzta6gkHAC7A/tJ9b92JzAIhJQepE4u aFNNPouyG/HNE/yl3pP1ZNJx/x0UGCfxm0eYS1lj0ig77SYMWYWvn42NtKHsf7BeUhTA St6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=02ecKxROyMaxOfl2ioq79JYgCjdX2ho8dGRaSm3SvR8=; b=y9OaoPBAVu13rszZkj6ek14TKhns/zHDtv7McGFEiK1HL9x2Oy9mBlgBLxR+1P+Rlx z+6AU8q4uZloJt8Sd5a3o0AKachtU7aQpUKOC8SReNI/jCFkP7hINTuKr4atvJCIndWG oPNjoInFu5w/DgGzvMrcctrj0dS2+jbb+ai/ydHMCQ2yCyqXMqJisyfb4zYaYGrlP+4p Tczvxrf/1yPFdhNpqT9zDfqY5uJbY9VSWF8oueKtK8LcKYNAnJV7VoOBt3EbRJmD+QWa AkZII6gSquTIk1vWFUICuRszs+CkolbaabAEhfCS/14VZgINWpvNqXsp751NKq4C4hje UIEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt10si7555679edb.554.2020.09.14.07.38.18; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726664AbgINOfe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:35:34 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2818 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726745AbgINOc1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:32:27 -0400 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C7D0D341D0945326592E; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:25 +0100 (IST) Received: from localhost (10.52.126.156) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:30:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Atish Patra CC: , Albert Ou , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Anup Patel , "Arnd Bergmann" , Catalin Marinas , "David Hildenbrand" , Greentime Hu , Bjorn Helgaas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jia He , , , "Mike Rapoport" , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Palmer Dabbelt , "Paul Walmsley" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Steven Price , Will Deacon , Zong Li Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic Message-ID: <20200914153048.000038ed@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> References: <20200912013441.9730-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.52.126.156] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.68) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700 Atish Patra wrote: > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function > name to indicate that generic implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections at than anything important. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 ------------- > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) > > node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); > } > - > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = acpi_numa_init(); > - if (ret) { > - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > - return ret; > - } > - > - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > -} > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void) > max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max; > min_low_pfn = min; > > - arm64_numa_init(); > + arch_numa_init(); > > /* > - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve() > * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ > #include > #include > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > #include > +#endif Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here and has protections against building for non ACPI cases. > #include > > struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly; > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = acpi_numa_init(); I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init() and srat_disabled() At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though. > + if (ret) { > + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > +} > +#else > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +#endif > + > /** > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > * > * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The > * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory. > */ > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void) > +void __init arch_numa_init(void) > { > if (!numa_off) { > - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init)) > + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init)) > return; > if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init)) > return; > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) > } > #endif > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void); > +void __init arch_numa_init(void); > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end); > void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance); > void __init numa_free_distance(void); > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu); > static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { } > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { } > static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { } > > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */