Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2226455pxk; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzq/zakp1C4AuyTSnflPMsEgxxkFvd+EOi9Sya6UQiaph8DRiTQVF3e8LsSShH6B8cFc0Ai X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:119b:: with SMTP id n27mr14887160eja.124.1600095190800; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600095190; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HApxkp1Q4z5s5i/cQpnyFT0S1Tru5+R+Zy5I8d83szaK5x3qF38nqPM+Bn2LB+AUW5 exnF+M3cEjgTkO6FxroroREkkfIGoQUzXb41FR88dnaq+QnEclS4RZhje7aVDfzTKZBM OZZ61vQebQ19nTzu+b0yugAPU/8t/qGRFWAG97RaYxin9Et1GnG39uXfzgi2+MMNjJzH 4VUIMIPd+YK8Re/KvTanAzpS4fRHhYNPwZxtFtAv9Rd3xJXsA/X7ZyVyLMiaOSV50vna l8a9AIv3cXUIgbQRR0Uq5AKoGH8MXySeIm7RXTrIodOZMhJSG1nU4+xGmV06bH7q+RTl X69Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=FVHWevWvC+ODFe+C9fzi7mDg/+o+wIzObBE1wxQaR0U=; b=S64ApC57/SvVSRMjcLmpWrrodZReF4Q1C/zAA+jjWNsFJpfODTz7bzG993eM2KKhOm HZ8o/3Svp4cS01KbG8KasXegJDi4ord2vmHdWMU/Srn6va00Tcmjx4j8feLWuSPMyy2v YmUqp+Fj9W7LgtD8uPkmR8IifehHzUY09lEivXOEaYp+o68Z45wO5gKmFB+SPslLTcEU ubXR0a2+RosDlHr2dr+WxenTcTPPh97Eet1Ekzqa6cP7f4Q2AI4tiIVJbQFMiF0czv4r 6I8b70/TZRWKOk07JmKYRJIxY5g/18OmcBMpVpFR6Y/R0C1LfxR6DhBHRLtJgivtT7IC 4mKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6si7329079edm.308.2020.09.14.07.52.46; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726709AbgINOvr (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:51:47 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:35895 "EHLO relay11.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726300AbgINOum (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:50:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [103.82.80.9]) (Authenticated sender: me@yadavpratyush.com) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CDBE100007; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:20:22 +0530 From: Pratyush Yadav To: Michael Walle Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Richard Weinberger , Miquel Raynal , Jungseung Lee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: spi-nor: cleanup common code Message-ID: <20200914145022.rdjfaw5vzk7gzvfy@yadavpratyush.com> References: <20200911222634.31804-1-michael@walle.cc> <20200911222634.31804-2-michael@walle.cc> <20200914094046.tccoc54n7e36zzyr@yadavpratyush.com> <6d52e1bdbbefc9383904e28bcc1c78a7@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d52e1bdbbefc9383904e28bcc1c78a7@walle.cc> X-Spam-Flag: yes X-Spam-Level: ************************** X-GND-Spam-Score: 400 X-GND-Status: SPAM Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/09/20 01:09PM, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Pratyush, > > Am 2020-09-14 11:40, schrieb Pratyush Yadav: > > Hi Michael, > > > > *sigh* This patch will cause a _lot_ of conflicts with my series [0]. It > > should hopefully go in the next merge window so maybe you can rebase on > > top of it? Dunno. > > Could you pick up this patch in some form in your series? It looks like your > series touches most/some of the functions. The patch just removes code > repetitions. I don't want to make any last-minute changes that could end up blocking the series. Its been pending for many months now. > TBH I don't need this patch as I just can implement my new one-byte command > using the current "if (nor->spimem) {} else {}" pattern. It is up to you what you want to do about the patch. Maybe you can drop it now and send it later when things have settled down? Dunno. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav