Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:13:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:13:43 -0500 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:16049 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:13:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:13:53 +0100 (CET) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Benjamin LaHaise , Andrea Arcangeli Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> But of course going from page flush to the mm flush is fine from my part >> too. As Linus noted a few days ago during swapout we're going to block >> and reschedule all the time, so the range flush is going to be a noop in > > Only on architectures where the TLB (or equivalent) is > small and only capable of holding entries for one address > space at a time. > > It's simply not true on eg PPC. #ifdef ? Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/