Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <269479609d444b2caebdc4d5d156bd5438a1899e.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 12/19] lockdep: Add recursive read locks into
 dependency graph
From:   Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:04:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9b9780715a62d22a5229e9baae7e66a7f19d83eb.camel@redhat.com>
References: <20200807074238.1632519-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
         <20200807074238.1632519-13-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
         <9b9780715a62d22a5229e9baae7e66a7f19d83eb.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 14:16 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 15:42 +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Since we have all the fundamental to handle recursive read locks, we now
> > add them into the dependency graph.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> 
> Reverting this patch and its dependency:
> 
> [14/19] lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
> chainkey
> 
> fixed a splat below. IOW, this patch introduced this new splat which looks 

Sorry, it turned out my previous reproducer was not so reliable, but now I found
a new reliable reproducer that could trigger this on both x86 and powerpc every
time which so far points out the culprit being the patchset:

"[PATCH v1 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support" [1].

It also matched exactly the exact timing (today) between the issue showed up and
the patchset was merged into linux-next. I'll do a bit more confirmation and
report it there.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828010710.5407-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de/