Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2834478pxk; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfmXLDGDrIbFOUCDPGNAXTuI70dIGCsQlVjXVhPa6ONww1arBOBHS0PHS7rsy57SJTDvQl X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cf05:: with SMTP id a5mr21943624edy.313.1600166515417; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600166515; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GHqgkZG1nAX1qJ4fi8mx+FLET3jt669vAOFVCJqz6I04Kbs8LcD0boKkZRuP3FYoP1 SQXTsXc7YZgnClcJpyTBnG62k1VCbs2F2UB6Vod86/2lvJ2yt+7f0FiTonuXC1649KJl mVc1WKmlqmVekXg/eWLeVbQsm5x998ioCeEzo6eQwDV8dJ694nok5pNT5lQgfnHh5Dlw V9B/YX4OpwlpZSU+OUvWqwiNTFNYIIM/vBwyhg2DfyavAB5FVGqfatJA6qQcBzCt+nye pzPYUaT+39Jxw22Hqa+HzCkUZuJt41wIF8ENLhyuoQgI2EeOJzHZpLjcVJGG4zc1haXl z0XA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=bSYXIOg/CSSIjVdtWGcFQNIUaN9KWHw0HXTCYjhpUr8=; b=znDbaep9oet+KCWQSnkEiqHdT6qKsrqeZx5K38I4myu93QQaV6TzC3PSnKqFVOJTcL JbPGBKWoLBeeukhO+FFACkJRJBtdhzrH+j8sWN8ZOaBBslUX/fzMC/Npa5A3K/nqn14w j8SKnJdy7SZhk0LhqrOv+Lqns78Qlj2E2ZTAVQw8XlqixNA18viOkEcj838Ukk9FJMMg 0cqlxOmC7kJPxbhdAsf0eOzM25Hlim/iMsSAucjeXjM3lDMGPq/MhU/9ie8Nro/8WQvZ dsvbY040gDRTiI5YmhXTPL1KJVXjStn79WCfKwnhdyjeiWkpWDD2ADd22mBoFBVCeZBa FR2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Moui+I7b; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id br19si8730596ejb.151.2020.09.15.03.41.33; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Moui+I7b; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726239AbgIOKkK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:40:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55048 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726171AbgIOKkA (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:40:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08203C06178A; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id bh1so1123683plb.12; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:40:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bSYXIOg/CSSIjVdtWGcFQNIUaN9KWHw0HXTCYjhpUr8=; b=Moui+I7bCWOknQfNmSarkSwXoX6LQxFft/VXNOpWT3NkQmptbS7OdHLF5JW1VPMV2j pnXaLEiZsVFF6hsM/oVRhbpfp0vWGrNSqwMT31LOdB3mKo/Al+3u3uogwcJF902s9OIa JnZIuO1WgATsABJmQEwzBjD7exUW5DcOVy8CWKcUL3sV6NQXE4Mt3RkFk8XTJvfw1LCI U7He5eAfy0oCK26TyGDW6p9brQEiPpQm+qDMPnZkJeQuoeKKnvdf9Y8ScF/HI+mknciq EomaFzEDXgU74c45L28lxZ2dPpPUCewIWvNyOOkb15zkDZBoePNUFKRlmXsGm15wSJee eLQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bSYXIOg/CSSIjVdtWGcFQNIUaN9KWHw0HXTCYjhpUr8=; b=OSobPYrWBxd8wrf7cxTNOaaBLPWYZVyF5jf60rjSu6PgzK5BwH87SfD0dMi0dAi9/0 LLTcdyiB7sHUEHxicDd59cFLxYTsmAENKuufFiLD7/LD+30L9fvpWL9MuJ7i7PW8fBCx 9o2YNrNVj5r7YQJTYYX5Nwd27hcwEWk2csQjsJEfPXB2SY7vr7yMS1dK7nNe/IyHxJ++ FRJ1aDC+ANQG8/+3VyiVRbSXZpcMWUldH9Dz6zt5SjfkhXGCQHArY332p9kH3nmEUCFo CbvEeQqbwEQeLNTOkDCICBRW4jNj8NkibMMSl4d+oMRyWYcNoy6R1na/ad2lvNwgCD3q LHqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mJPtrOBXTD6/VqAYm2NoHKkEiqKMZ1rBsimhnLILanjZ4whVx ZL8BTAleurBIdJu0HmhfUCvHWC9hC+RsRzMzY6k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9e08:b029:d0:8a6a:d5e8 with SMTP id d8-20020a1709029e08b02900d08a6ad5e8mr18437305plq.0.1600166399376; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:39:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200909102640.1657622-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <20200909102640.1657622-10-warthog618@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200909102640.1657622-10-warthog618@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:39:41 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/20] gpiolib: cdev: support edge detection for uAPI v2 To: Kent Gibson Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:33 PM Kent Gibson wrote: > > Add support for edge detection to lines requested using > GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL. > > The edge_detector implementation is based on the v1 lineevent > implementation. ... > + * @timestamp: cache for the timestamp storing it between hardirq and IRQ > + * thread, used to bring the timestamp close to the actual event _ns ? > + * @req_seqno: the seqno for the current edge event in the sequence of > + * events for the corresponding line request. This is drawn from the @req. > + * @line_seqno: the seqno for the current edge event in the sequence of > + * events for this line. > */ > struct line { > struct gpio_desc *desc; > + /* > + * -- edge detector specific fields -- > + */ > + struct linereq *req; > + unsigned int irq; > + u64 eflags; > + /* > + * timestamp and req_seqno are shared by edge_irq_handler() and > + * edge_irq_thread() which are themselves mutually exclusive. > + */ I didn't quite get this comment. Does it mean we should define them as union here? Or is it about how functions consider this data and no lock is needed? Or what? > + u64 timestamp; > + u32 req_seqno; > + u32 line_seqno; > }; > > /** > @@ -395,12 +418,22 @@ struct line { > * @gdev: the GPIO device the line request pertains to > * @label: consumer label used to tag GPIO descriptors > * @num_lines: the number of lines in the lines array > + * @wait: wait queue that handles blocking reads of events > + * @event_buffer_size: the number of elements allocated in @events > + * @events: KFIFO for the GPIO events > + * @seqno: the sequence number for edge events generated on all lines in > + * this line request. Note that this is not used when @num_lines is 1, as > + * the line_seqno is then the same and is cheaper to calculate. > * @lines: the lines held by this line request, with @num_lines elements. > */ > struct linereq { > struct gpio_device *gdev; > const char *label; > u32 num_lines; > + wait_queue_head_t wait; > + u32 event_buffer_size; > + DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(events, struct gpio_v2_line_event); > + atomic_t seqno; > struct line lines[]; > }; > > @@ -417,12 +450,138 @@ struct linereq { > (GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN | \ > GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE) > > +#define GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS \ > + (GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING | \ > + GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING) > + > #define GPIO_V2_LINE_VALID_FLAGS \ > (GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW | \ > GPIO_V2_LINE_DIRECTION_FLAGS | \ > GPIO_V2_LINE_DRIVE_FLAGS | \ > + GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS | \ > GPIO_V2_LINE_BIAS_FLAGS) > > +static irqreturn_t edge_irq_thread(int irq, void *p) > +{ > + struct line *line = p; > + struct linereq *lr = line->req; > + struct gpio_v2_line_event le; > + int ret; > + > + /* Do not leak kernel stack to userspace */ > + memset(&le, 0, sizeof(le)); > + > + /* > + * We may be running from a nested threaded interrupt in which case > + * we didn't get the timestamp from edge_irq_handler(). > + */ > + if (!line->timestamp) { Can it be positive conditional? > + le.timestamp = ktime_get_ns(); > + if (lr->num_lines != 1) > + line->req_seqno = atomic_inc_return(&lr->seqno); > + } else { > + le.timestamp = line->timestamp; > + } > + line->timestamp = 0; > + > + if (line->eflags == (GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING | > + GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING)) { > + int level = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(line->desc); > + > + if (level) > + /* Emit low-to-high event */ > + le.id = GPIO_V2_LINE_EVENT_RISING_EDGE; > + else > + /* Emit high-to-low event */ > + le.id = GPIO_V2_LINE_EVENT_FALLING_EDGE; > + } else if (line->eflags == GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING) { > + /* Emit low-to-high event */ > + le.id = GPIO_V2_LINE_EVENT_RISING_EDGE; > + } else if (line->eflags == GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING) { > + /* Emit high-to-low event */ > + le.id = GPIO_V2_LINE_EVENT_FALLING_EDGE; > + } else { > + return IRQ_NONE; > + } > + line->line_seqno++; > + le.line_seqno = line->line_seqno; > + le.seqno = (lr->num_lines == 1) ? le.line_seqno : line->req_seqno; > + le.offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(line->desc); > + > + ret = kfifo_in_spinlocked_noirqsave(&lr->events, &le, > + 1, &lr->wait.lock); > + if (ret) > + wake_up_poll(&lr->wait, EPOLLIN); > + else > + pr_debug_ratelimited("event FIFO is full - event dropped\n"); Oh, can we really avoid printf() in IRQ context? > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t edge_irq_handler(int irq, void *p) > +{ > + struct line *line = p; > + struct linereq *lr = line->req; > + > + /* > + * Just store the timestamp in hardirq context so we get it as > + * close in time as possible to the actual event. > + */ > + line->timestamp = ktime_get_ns(); > + > + if (lr->num_lines != 1) > + line->req_seqno = atomic_inc_return(&lr->seqno); > + > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > +} > + > +static void edge_detector_stop(struct line *line) > +{ > + if (line->irq) { > + free_irq(line->irq, line); > + line->irq = 0; > + } Perhaps if (!line->irq) return; ? > +} > + > +static int edge_detector_setup(struct line *line, > + u64 eflags) > +{ > + unsigned long irqflags = 0; > + int irq, ret; > + > + if (eflags && !kfifo_initialized(&line->req->events)) { > + ret = kfifo_alloc(&line->req->events, > + line->req->event_buffer_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + line->eflags = eflags; > + > + if (!eflags) > + return 0; > + > + irq = gpiod_to_irq(line->desc); > + if (irq <= 0) > + return -ENODEV; Why shadowing actual error code? > + if (eflags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING) > + irqflags |= test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &line->desc->flags) ? > + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING : IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING; > + if (eflags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING) > + irqflags |= test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &line->desc->flags) ? > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING; > + irqflags |= IRQF_ONESHOT; > + > + /* Request a thread to read the events */ > + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, edge_irq_handler, edge_irq_thread, > + irqflags, line->req->label, line); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + line->irq = irq; > + return 0; > +} > + > static u64 gpio_v2_line_config_flags(struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc, > unsigned int line_idx) > { > @@ -465,6 +624,11 @@ static int gpio_v2_line_flags_validate(u64 flags) > (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT)) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* Edge detection requires explicit input. */ > + if ((flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS) && > + !(flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_INPUT)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > /* > * Do not allow OPEN_SOURCE & OPEN_DRAIN flags in a single request. If > * the hardware actually supports enabling both at the same time the > @@ -526,6 +690,10 @@ static void gpio_v2_line_config_flags_to_desc_flags(u64 flags, > set_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, flagsp); > else if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_INPUT) > clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, flagsp); > + assign_bit(FLAG_EDGE_RISING, flagsp, > + flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING); > + assign_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, flagsp, > + flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING); > assign_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, flagsp, > flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN); > assign_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, flagsp, > @@ -614,14 +782,85 @@ static long linereq_ioctl_compat(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > } > #endif > > +static __poll_t linereq_poll(struct file *file, > + struct poll_table_struct *wait) > +{ > + struct linereq *lr = file->private_data; > + __poll_t events = 0; > + > + poll_wait(file, &lr->wait, wait); > + > + if (!kfifo_is_empty_spinlocked_noirqsave(&lr->events, > + &lr->wait.lock)) > + events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > + > + return events; > +} > + > +static ssize_t linereq_read(struct file *file, > + char __user *buf, > + size_t count, > + loff_t *f_ps) > +{ > + struct linereq *lr = file->private_data; > + struct gpio_v2_line_event le; > + ssize_t bytes_read = 0; > + int ret; > + > + if (count < sizeof(le)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + do { > + spin_lock(&lr->wait.lock); > + if (kfifo_is_empty(&lr->events)) { > + if (bytes_read) { > + spin_unlock(&lr->wait.lock); > + return bytes_read; > + } > + > + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) { > + spin_unlock(&lr->wait.lock); > + return -EAGAIN; > + } > + > + ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked(lr->wait, > + !kfifo_is_empty(&lr->events)); > + if (ret) { > + spin_unlock(&lr->wait.lock); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + > + ret = kfifo_out(&lr->events, &le, 1); > + spin_unlock(&lr->wait.lock); > + if (ret != 1) { > + /* > + * This should never happen - we were holding the > + * lock from the moment we learned the fifo is no > + * longer empty until now. > + */ > + ret = -EIO; > + break; > + } > + > + if (copy_to_user(buf + bytes_read, &le, sizeof(le))) > + return -EFAULT; > + bytes_read += sizeof(le); > + } while (count >= bytes_read + sizeof(le)); > + > + return bytes_read; > +} > + > static void linereq_free(struct linereq *lr) > { > unsigned int i; > > for (i = 0; i < lr->num_lines; i++) { > + edge_detector_stop(&lr->lines[i]); > if (lr->lines[i].desc) > gpiod_free(lr->lines[i].desc); > } > + kfifo_free(&lr->events); > kfree(lr->label); > put_device(&lr->gdev->dev); > kfree(lr); > @@ -637,6 +876,8 @@ static int linereq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > > static const struct file_operations line_fileops = { > .release = linereq_release, > + .read = linereq_read, > + .poll = linereq_poll, > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .llseek = noop_llseek, > .unlocked_ioctl = linereq_ioctl, > @@ -676,6 +917,9 @@ static int linereq_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) > lr->gdev = gdev; > get_device(&gdev->dev); > > + for (i = 0; i < ulr.num_lines; i++) > + lr->lines[i].req = lr; > /* Make sure this is terminated */ > ulr.consumer[sizeof(ulr.consumer)-1] = '\0'; > if (strlen(ulr.consumer)) { > @@ -686,6 +930,14 @@ static int linereq_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) > } > } > > + init_waitqueue_head(&lr->wait); > + lr->event_buffer_size = ulr.event_buffer_size; > + if (lr->event_buffer_size == 0) > + lr->event_buffer_size = ulr.num_lines*16; > + else if (lr->event_buffer_size > GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX*16) > + lr->event_buffer_size = GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX*16; *16 -> ' * 16' > + > + atomic_set(&lr->seqno, 0); > lr->num_lines = ulr.num_lines; > > /* Request each GPIO */ > @@ -724,6 +976,11 @@ static int linereq_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) > ret = gpiod_direction_input(desc); > if (ret) > goto out_free_linereq; > + > + ret = edge_detector_setup(&lr->lines[i], > + flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS); > + if (ret) > + goto out_free_linereq; > } > > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier, > @@ -1245,6 +1502,11 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc, > if (test_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags)) > info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_BIAS_PULL_UP; > > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EDGE_RISING, &desc->flags)) > + info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_RISING; > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, &desc->flags)) > + info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING; > + > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > index 80137c1b3cdc..e4c81dca7f8b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > @@ -2041,6 +2041,8 @@ static bool gpiod_free_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc) > clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags); > clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags); > clear_bit(FLAG_BIAS_DISABLE, &desc->flags); > + clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_RISING, &desc->flags); > + clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, &desc->flags); > clear_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags); > #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC > desc->hog = NULL; > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > index 6709f79c02dd..39b356160937 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ struct gpio_desc { > #define FLAG_PULL_UP 13 /* GPIO has pull up enabled */ > #define FLAG_PULL_DOWN 14 /* GPIO has pull down enabled */ > #define FLAG_BIAS_DISABLE 15 /* GPIO has pull disabled */ > +#define FLAG_EDGE_RISING 16 /* GPIO CDEV detects rising edge events */ > +#define FLAG_EDGE_FALLING 17 /* GPIO CDEV detects falling edge events */ > > /* Connection label */ > const char *label; > -- > 2.28.0 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko