Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2898357pxk; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGFJKEiTDb1Imz/G4sy0OmXQG/3b9ZH2bsBNuRh26knTGNHJooLSj2OC2U9A9kMILCHR/H X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd11:: with SMTP id i17mr21626196edv.170.1600172757367; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:25:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600172757; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KPUlhQtYM6B5Slfalwimo5Uv8Two1KL6fhQLFJ5orkgpZIGHJA2fbsgxWaiCWX7sio XpPjjWWxb9EUDmwx8AuPAIemPtz/q1dB2tBdKZHyZJWqodsU0CTd4j+EPhhbVTTwtuQY 45w0xNz7BOHI4LVYFtG3vc7TDkVawOorD3y2UlMkNBhEaMzj6n2eXgTc4X1XIh9U0YGQ iqITqrfPlYoGg/2xsq8qrwZd2zyxI5jAjs9rRjM5/HEt3l4U8X9yhkNKaYJJG4BEoV9a lJCkFNmj6zF97Vr3UoPGx0WeqTNzB60yGpLczg/+IfLlXA32ccLcUgrn1GhKwVm1EcLP 704Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=HOlhu4i7RpCsb9nmsus3iwP9qHCweFBxC4QKizJSZ8I=; b=fj+q90Yrg5SwqcO7MV804jMEzFTt1Z0V2Rex+sx5WDgG1IoRtOigu7ihe3fShh+ejy mGfANgjDsw6FSQpxhX7G5TIXY4FQiYtqOhi88KXo7ZgktjePCq3X5j9PyO79OEzRwxiC N+Czo5nR80RG0sRZYPglVI4bKFTqrosRvJ7+oLDKSUznHMh6pbDpbey0dIc7nb5jMDj/ 3RoXmKD/0uI99uxkSVjkALpQGMIUsFpM5fuZn/c256mRP3+rv3vrlaRuf8TcvE0/EwsT bmjXZqrkRBGG9mGrR8kdAI4c3kg/13TPBSqIayCeTvUMdUygp+UE9U0PokdjclkztvHa rupA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si9375779edr.29.2020.09.15.05.25.34; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726526AbgIOMXy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:23:54 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60720 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726466AbgIOMV1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:21:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AD1B032; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:21:25 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , John Ogness Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel.h: Move oops_in_progress to printk.h Message-ID: <20200915122125.GG11154@alley> References: <20200911170202.8565-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20200914084332.GC10658@alley> <20200914150018.GG3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200914150018.GG3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2020-09-14 18:00:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Fri 2020-09-11 20:02:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > The oops_in_progress is defined in printk.c, so it's logical > > > to move oops_in_progress to printk.h. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > > Yeah, it makes sense. > > > > Acked-by: Petr Mladek > > > > I am always a bit afraid of messing with these heavily used includes. > > Let's see if boots complain about some build failure. > > Agree. > > Just to clarify: I assumed, might be wrongly, that this will go via PRINTK > tree. If you have something else in mind, please tell, I will route it to > the corresponding maintainer(s). I have just pushed the patch into printk/linux.git, branch for-5.10. I am sorry that I was not clear enough. I wanted to wait at least one day just in case anyone (human or robot) complains. Best Regards, Petr