Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:17:01 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Static call dependency on libelf version?
Message-ID: <20200915141701.j5fnir63trpwqbfp@treble>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009142337530.1550@eggly.anvils>
 <20200915093016.GV1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <d02d57308d9e8febd569c3fd3757dbcc87b1c4a1.camel@klomp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d02d57308d9e8febd569c3fd3757dbcc87b1c4a1.camel@klomp.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> But all this is for ancient versions of elfutils libelf. So it is hard
> to say and my memory might be failing. If someone can confirm 0.158
> (which is 6 years old) works fine I would pick that as minimum version,
> otherwise simply go with 0.168 which is 4 years old and should be on
> most systems by now.

I just discovered elf_version(), I assume that would allow us to check
and enforce the libelf version?

-- 
Josh