Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp113441pxk; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVvSZA2TtDj4YeBrKVanJIxMfjx8JOqPJzge/wJFe/vwMsvfix4hes1pBU4SY2JE7lPkIm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4f16:: with SMTP id t22mr23352112eju.40.1600235190016; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600235190; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FfNkQkhmq+ksgeAYb2fChDxz9eK4NlTIRfN+eOW745kWg0Di8RnnI+ak3CVndOfkiV BnEAASiPAFoSotlAFd+tqM0RXTGzd9d4LamuCX6iPMjz+2eMLBPgbOIrmO14E1h8FVWc QRcMZAUrv2sLpylNqaXb7DIt/b19I93hERQfOHhVOKye+PG/Q6w88XezUfA9+GSimh+a zIhXeMg1wzMJbI0sVGXMo8G8vQTuydBUpw0UawYUbkVIdtiXoIpYxaYYjjk9sEhtgb19 qRNCB4FPpU+F09FHDRaGmYalW7nGAOYtw57X+yaJT4QO3TmO785nUjGA2MV4GqbC/FBF i8wQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Qrq3sWEJgoeWzhxV9j06LwtU7QYCo+thwWi88qL3VUg=; b=AZiBi2O+qklulGGmmtJaU93Vjvn6qjjMgBwFph4iNB3ksDJFAmVK6nPMJiEbggm4bC NrRIptMhZHIVGAkcWOJrVAhwFPp6BfoA7nw8skawa+9x8+U78OafW7masMu0g/ssS+tc +vHYazX7PjPLyIur6zmkEBS5mMLbNtbxGYaEvlIZr+OVdPIyL1j7qoRiVpP7IEcx4VFZ t94Zh0r9YVX/69aDvwgW88yiPzy3o8HDZDcYNnVelXtJP2e+upvsnD0jHxUozkISAOlr g0zolXNRRw83j0myiYTzmiXvvfGfpypkpx+aJHc1qb5jMivyOktrxDIKpkiHz/LJJOUB 1Vyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fkcHvmro; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n17si10932303edq.422.2020.09.15.22.46.07; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fkcHvmro; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726150AbgIPFnW (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:43:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726068AbgIPFnV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:43:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1041.google.com (mail-pj1-x1041.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1041]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9996C06174A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1041.google.com with SMTP id jw11so965882pjb.0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:43:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Qrq3sWEJgoeWzhxV9j06LwtU7QYCo+thwWi88qL3VUg=; b=fkcHvmrop4VahHNbAfKqUN9Z/xnGxShl3cVT2cp7BchjyYuKrTxQhmozhdhOt9+HYy XOlsmy/Dw9CsyTkM4O4wZI95ngjedk5Oa7YUAmjl9Z1DnL/a90UYT6pC61ajUuZqbSh7 eWjqs1cBJo35Sc4E9NgZpBvJjNVRVIFIS7YGW126knVlIP1JRzdb5LDmgF2setaPgYlT UqdmBeky+98yaxUJx40dnkyrFks8kaySDmUER2CGfzlvhE5Cb5vT7Qc3DgZB6huGA3h0 BTICEaoQoiyTkGWQyxr6uc2f0+FTS+hOD+XBZ/ZGyVptfLZsCIoFxCOqBa889EHlMgtK ShMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Qrq3sWEJgoeWzhxV9j06LwtU7QYCo+thwWi88qL3VUg=; b=eBR3abtJrl5RyCxRGh4h9k98iJmPPJ3UvCiOz8plnawJNtF7vA/CcKD5B1H1ZNiKoG jJ+PMnjr9ra330iwYGgO9xTyNLi1VKxIqQWpgenV9otzDEMDKam2doJ3gdbOU+6h9kSl 8SUg2Eimt6wfTwUZvyVkPuucfabBOFNgQlb2+2+E0VflvGb17YjVihqZTZ3Ort90Biks dTyviaj2AWZC3Bww4+yhTy+rw1orjAYASPOxhNvknmLrMQq2xU0uY3098SZQqcocAWk4 JvMzc/GlicW2/qf+h+6SEBaVcKtHtMPhDRe+AQjXgtl9gJ7zVjXZGNcX16HRuPyfDIzI c9uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qJYY9QsRjayS4ODyZ+QZlQhZG6ym2NKGhYONPXok0my2TUZvI l0QFLWrnibQkQ4BHGEXeFPSN5jYtqJNdrVf03hI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cb93:: with SMTP id a19mr430370pju.207.1600234999844; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([49.207.198.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i62sm15140419pfe.140.2020.09.15.22.43.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: WARNING in batadv_iv_send_outstanding_bat_ogm_packet To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller-bugs , syzkaller , LKML References: <00000000000059b6d40594d0f776@google.com> From: Anant Thazhemadam Message-ID: <7cff3e3e-4003-a2bc-9917-a006e76854c8@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:13:16 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/09/20 10:25 am, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:34 PM Anant Thazhemadam > wrote: >> On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 2:25:08 AM UTC+5:30 syzbot wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> syzbot found the following crash on: >>> >>> HEAD commit: da940012 Merge tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc3' of git://git.kernel.. >>> git tree: upstream >>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13ffd808e00000 >>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2d2fd92a28d3e50 >>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c0b807de416427ff3dd1 >>> compiler: clang version 9.0.0 (/home/glider/llvm/clang >>> 80fee25776c2fb61e74c1ecb1a523375c2500b69) >>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=141ffd77600000 >>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=11edd580e00000 >>> >>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit: >>> Reported-by: syzbot+c0b807...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >>> >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 30 at net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:382 >>> batadv_iv_ogm_emit net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:382 [inline] >>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 30 at net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:382 >>> batadv_iv_send_outstanding_bat_ogm_packet+0x6b4/0x770 >>> net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:1663 >>> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... >>> CPU: 1 PID: 30 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc2+ #0 >>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS >>> Google 01/01/2011 >>> Workqueue: bat_events batadv_iv_send_outstanding_bat_ogm_packet >>> Call Trace: >>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] >>> dump_stack+0x1d8/0x2f8 lib/dump_stack.c:113 >>> panic+0x264/0x7a9 kernel/panic.c:221 >>> __warn+0x20e/0x210 kernel/panic.c:582 >>> report_bug+0x1b6/0x2f0 lib/bug.c:195 >>> fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:179 [inline] >>> do_error_trap+0xd7/0x440 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:272 >>> do_invalid_op+0x36/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291 >>> invalid_op+0x23/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1028 >>> RIP: 0010:batadv_iv_ogm_emit net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:382 [inline] >>> RIP: 0010:batadv_iv_send_outstanding_bat_ogm_packet+0x6b4/0x770 >>> net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c:1663 >>> Code: 66 05 00 eb 05 e8 9c 48 23 fa 48 83 c4 68 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f >>> 5d c3 e8 88 48 23 fa 0f 0b e9 34 ff ff ff e8 7c 48 23 fa <0f> 0b e9 28 ff >>> ff ff 89 d9 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 0f 8c c1 f9 ff >>> RSP: 0018:ffff8880a9abfc48 EFLAGS: 00010293 >>> RAX: ffffffff874fe8a4 RBX: ffff888094160870 RCX: ffff8880a9ab2080 >>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000002 >>> RBP: ffff8880a9abfcd8 R08: ffffffff874fe28e R09: ffffed10123e6969 >>> R10: ffffed10123e6969 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888091f34000 >>> R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff8880a80c5000 R15: ffff8880a4481400 >>> process_one_work+0x7ef/0x10e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 >>> worker_thread+0xc01/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 >>> kthread+0x332/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:255 >>> ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 >>> Kernel Offset: disabled >>> Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. >>> >>> >>> --- >>> This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. >>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. >>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com. >>> >>> syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See: >>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. >>> syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see: >>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches >> >> For this bug, syzbot does not seem to be able to build the kernel anymore. >> Can bugs like these be considered and closed as invalid? >> >> Thanks, >> Anant > Hi Anant, > > +syzkaler, lkml (nobody is generally reading syzkaller-bugs). > > What do you mean by "not able to build a kernel for this bug"? > Building a kernel is not related to a particular bug. It's the same > for all bugs... Hi, I thought this might be a query that's better suited for the syzkaller groups, and hence posted it on there. I wanted to check if this bug was still present and relevant, so I tried to check by sending a syz test request for the upstream kernel (the dashboard shows that the error was found in the upstream kernel). However, I was notified later that the build/boot had failed. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt that the reason build/boot had failed, was because of the bug itself (the error report is visible on the bug's dashboard page itself). I wanted to know what was the typical protocol in cases like this. Would this be a valid reason enough to close the bug as invalid? Or is there something else that can be done, to indicate that the upstream kernel doesn't even build/boot for this bug to be tested anymore? If nothing else, how else can I try and get syzbot to test if this bug still exists or not? Thanks, Anant