Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:08:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:08:00 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:14093 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:07:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:07:37 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , Subject: Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c In-Reply-To: <20011030180023.L1340@athlon.random> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > again from the cache with a minor fault, IMHO there's no way such tlb > flush removal can make a difference in a DBMS workload on a sanely > setup machine, I'm amazed you think it can make a difference. You seem to be hammering on the DBMS scenario because Ben chose a bad example, without taking a step back and realising that his point is valid, though mostly with other examples. Linus came up with a more efficient way to make sure we get to see (and clear) the accessed bits, lets use that one and get on with life. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/