Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp190024pxk; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:36:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydo+SeWTUdfgSiwJsnIBckVFVEHSlBLCzdZ+tH+OV1Xs1LjWIa0jqtU0epOmSARApFjUsU X-Received: by 2002:a50:fb0e:: with SMTP id d14mr27443417edq.172.1600245400324; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:36:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600245400; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q0gLq4rW011ThOHuNGQ4ARULnW0dDoQRZ7btDJKsb56QsmwDfZFHyYWQVwqTzB3PUe ppPFa0yXkyES9A5CaYrEdvA6Uz66PRfWD19Vda1fZZRcaA140fGoMaGZnptw5wVc70A8 KWR5pL7xvw3IOznkNp40J5NeYTiydVXWxJ+wNc8pplEnlORC/dlJhJRJRGZcoA3bzIzJ 5vNBtmgBY9AVID5X0URKv9Yi4BgPSE0kBxkYF3BWBHUCZgFiK/yFIFOQdJp3rIEAQuOy oVc2z0ilFwuW/SPNkPVxdp2yeX8cmbtHuy/HMEsOF1BOJmzC1sDxBvsNIwP4tgWoZ9GU FDBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=ljwWyeP4pnTFi9nBd4edRhbKUMolUy6CKDMgIkEl/3Q=; b=zvnHXd606w2ogLfuctH1fDpbcSJN/867gaXiUYKBGx9arNXiLuHL48pR03jCf6kcxC enGebm4ppmsL/2FWL/xEidNXK0qZaoZl+DerKJ4JoteyrZ4dAjX25n7R4lht5i/8P85r 9OvQpyiRbfsVV+Ntt/2LLSh3ekgwwn6EE4yM1MgxATJWKU2gAvWCam2o0Mkjzb1tEdwz csc0W5fbZ6zpak7dgX1LhOTzSOOF071VeDaZ/9ZABIxP24Q/3Zb7+mBIX6lXP/CWi+BL qi2lmrcslms1tX2NFYrUYuN1bvHVg8gNm0TT6/vLGA7L9yNr0ckHyGoe2/OlDRnYGnyx kEow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=nd09tycz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z6si3233481edr.566.2020.09.16.01.36.17; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=nd09tycz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726572AbgIPIdi (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 04:33:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36110 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726349AbgIPIdh (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 04:33:37 -0400 Received: from lt-jalone-7480.mtl.com (c-24-6-56-119.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.56.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F2D8206DC; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:33:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600245217; bh=Rxv7LUtX5OOwYwfMY6OFP0ly0hsgeYow1jDz+KP5aNA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nd09tyczy1fwGBIA4dlKWgU20CIqgxVYoR7eidAzDV84z4U170OgQdsLYFaKUlxR4 uikblA9OmXDhqrnZ9dhX+ajoujqfaUi+rCCtz5JKw0ZdHIL9Kf2B8HJjhips2CIcc3 EeJc5w5m39NHViYfjArIlqsT+JQSfKCsM/o3BWZw= Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: hns3: use napi_consume_skb() when cleaning tx desc From: Saeed Mahameed To: Yunsheng Lin , Saeed Mahameed , "tanhuazhong@huawei.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , Eric Dumazet Cc: "yisen.zhuang@huawei.com" , "salil.mehta@huawei.com" , "linuxarm@huawei.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kuba@kernel.org" Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:33:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <2b1219b6-a7dd-38a3-bfb7-1cb49330df90@huawei.com> References: <1600085217-26245-1-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com> <1600085217-26245-7-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com> <2b1219b6-a7dd-38a3-bfb7-1cb49330df90@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 15:04 +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > On 2020/9/15 13:09, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:06 +0800, Huazhong Tan wrote: > > > From: Yunsheng Lin > > > > > > Use napi_consume_skb() to batch consuming skb when cleaning > > > tx desc in NAPI polling. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin > > > Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan > > > --- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c | 27 > > > +++++++++++- > > > ---------- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_ethtool.c | 4 ++-- > > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c > > > index 4a49a76..feeaf75 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c > > > @@ -2333,10 +2333,10 @@ static int hns3_alloc_buffer(struct > > > hns3_enet_ring *ring, > > > } > > > > > > static void hns3_free_buffer(struct hns3_enet_ring *ring, > > > - struct hns3_desc_cb *cb) > > > + struct hns3_desc_cb *cb, int budget) > > > { > > > if (cb->type == DESC_TYPE_SKB) > > > - dev_kfree_skb_any((struct sk_buff *)cb->priv); > > > + napi_consume_skb(cb->priv, budget); > > > > This code can be reached from hns3_lb_clear_tx_ring() below which > > is > > your loopback test and called with non-zero budget, I am not sure > > you > > are allowed to call napi_consume_skb() with non-zero budget outside > > napi context, perhaps the cb->type for loopback test is different > > in lb > > test case ? Idk.. , please double check other code paths. > > Yes, loopback test may call napi_consume_skb() with non-zero budget > outside > napi context. Thanks for pointing out this case. > > How about add the below WARN_ONCE() in napi_consume_skb() to catch > this > kind of error? > > WARN_ONCE(!in_serving_softirq(), "napi_consume_skb() is called with > non-zero budget outside napi context"); > Cc: Eric I don't know, need to check performance impact. And in_serving_softirq() doesn't necessarily mean in napi but looking at _kfree_skb_defer(), i think it shouldn't care if napi or not as long as it runs in soft irq it will push the skb to that particular cpu napi_alloc_cache, which should be fine. Maybe instead of the WARN_ONCE just remove the budget condition and replace it with if (!in_serving_softirq()) dev_consume_skb_any(skb);