Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:02:33 +0200
From:   peterz@infradead.org
To:     Qian Cai <caiqian@redhat.com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support
Message-ID: <20200916130233.GS2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200904153231.11994-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
 <224bd11b533dd2acff3f6cce51ab4ca676eb4f9f.camel@redhat.com>
 <20200915124817.GA127490@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <20200915143028.GB2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <32bfdec1ad4e11cfecd840e1b83d95ba2bab1abc.camel@redhat.com>
 <20200916125402.GR2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1750732498.13475000.1600261259894.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1750732498.13475000.1600261259894.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:00:59AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined
> > > > > at
> > > > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> > > > 
> > > > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > > > 
> > > > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > > > option.
> > > 
> > > Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?
> > 
> > Did you verify it works? I only wrote it..
> 
> Yes, I did.

Excellent, I'll stick a Tested-by from you on then.