Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:06:31 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
        "Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
        "Tadakamadla, Rajesh (DCIG/CDI/HPS Perf)" 
        <rajesh.tadakamadla@hpe.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmem: export the symbols __copy_user_flushcache and
 __copy_from_user_flushcache
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gD0ZFkfajKTDnJhEEjf+5Av-GH+cHRFoyhzGe8bNEgAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009161359540.20710@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009140852030.22422@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> <CAPcyv4gh=QaDB61_9_QTgtt-pZuTFdR6td0orE0VMH6=6SA2vw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009151216050.16057@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009151332280.3851@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009160649560.20720@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> <CAPcyv4gW6AvR+RaShHdQzOaEPv9nrq5myXDmywuoCTYDZxk-hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009161254400.745@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> <CAPcyv4gD0ZFkfajKTDnJhEEjf+5Av-GH+cHRFoyhzGe8bNEgAA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Dan Williams wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 AM Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My first question about nvfs is how it compares to a daxfs with
> > > executables and other binaries configured to use page cache with the
> > > new per-file dax facility?
> >
> > nvfs is faster than dax-based filesystems on metadata-heavy operations
> > because it doesn't have the overhead of the buffer cache and bios. See
> > this: http://people.redhat.com/~mpatocka/nvfs/BENCHMARKS
> 
> ...and that metadata problem is intractable upstream? Christoph poked
> at bypassing the block layer for xfs metadata operations [1], I just
> have not had time to carry that further.
> 
> [1]: "xfs: use dax_direct_access for log writes", although it seems
> he's dropped that branch from his xfs.git

XFS is very big. I wanted to create something small.

Mikulas