Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200916134327.3435-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20200916142930.GK3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200916142930.GK3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:47:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md5diJd+C2j_sHcZN5tM+r_W0Tz-naK1s=qd1bx-_g0Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] gpiolib: check for parent device in devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:29 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:43:27PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >
> > It's possible for a GPIO chip to not have a parent device (whose
> > properties we inspect for 'gpio-line-names'). In this case we should
> > simply return from devprop_gpiochip_set_names(). Add an appropriate
> > check for this use-case.
>
> Ah, nice!
> Can we also add a small comment in the code, b/c w/o it I would stumble over
> and eager to remove looks-as-unneeded check?
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Sure, I'll make a v2 then.

Bart