Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:45:39 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Hongbo Wang <hongbo.wang@nxp.com>
Cc:     Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com>, Po Liu <po.liu@nxp.com>,
        Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
        "allan.nielsen@microchip.com" <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        "idosch@idosch.org" <idosch@idosch.org>,
        "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "vinicius.gomes@intel.com" <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
        "nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com" <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
        "roopa@cumulusnetworks.com" <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "horatiu.vultur@microchip.com" <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
        "alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
        "ivecera@redhat.com" <ivecera@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] net: dsa: ocelot: Add support for QinQ
 Operation
Message-ID: <20200916104539.4bmimpmnrcsicamg@skbuf>
References: <20200916094845.10782-1-hongbo.wang@nxp.com>
 <20200916094845.10782-4-hongbo.wang@nxp.com>
 <20200916100024.lqlrqeuefudvgkxt@skbuf>
 <VI1PR04MB56775FD490351CCA04DAF3D7E1210@VI1PR04MB5677.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB56775FD490351CCA04DAF3D7E1210@VI1PR04MB5677.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:28:38AM +0000, Hongbo Wang wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> if swp0 connects with customer, and swp1 connects with ISP, According
> to the VSC99599_1_00_TS.pdf, swp0 and swp1 will have different
> VLAN_POP_CNT && VLAN_AWARE_ENA,
>
> swp0 should set VLAN_CFG.VLAN_POP_CNT=0 && VLAN_CFG.VLAN_AWARE_ENA=0
> swp1 should set VLAN_CFG.VLAN_POP_CNT=1 && VLAN_CFG.VLAN_AWARE_ENA=1
>
> but when set vlan_filter=1, current code will set same value for both
> swp0 and swp1, for compatibility with existing code(802.1Q mode), so
> add devlink to set swp0 and swp1 into different modes.

But if you make VLAN_CFG.VLAN_AWARE_ENA=0, does that mean the switch
will accept any 802.1ad VLAN, not only those configured in the VLAN
database of the bridge? Otherwise said, after running the commands
above, and I send a packet to swp0 having tpid:88A8 vid:101, then the
bridge should not accept it.

I might be wrong, but I thought that an 802.1ad bridge with
vlan_filtering=1 behaves the same as an 802.1q bridge, except that it
should filter VLANs using a different TPID (0x88a8 instead of 0x8100).
I don't think the driver, in the way you're configuring it, does that,
does it?

Thanks,
-Vladimir