Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp661544pxk; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxj8+LnQ/RK0irtG6sw6tbmVhlt2Ms1f6BKTG3Nac3V8OYQD08do1iUbG/6O5ZOWLvuxTzy X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:10d3:: with SMTP id p19mr30403249edu.380.1600288856236; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600288856; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zZ4KrGwDA8V33sGqgeHqCsAOuMbxjfnzEVyulE+Xm51MkS6aX1Mtwwpe5aINVv7ANl ndhdNC5Fk+Yz1nirmhgXn6bIHNq/PhyqiUj9ZPtCRZsxapxLTuraxGFcQnLU0oNTXkGD FLji/2VDM5c487zFZG2ZL/4zKQtUBZ98cyFkVXgk2Vo+Buqar2l8JW+Wtmfa0hIAYg6d umzYQP/cbCaKfe60K8dS2NCbA98Sl3rLlbiZVpfM7bvQK3UAGU15kLkgVTvRBxBQm0GO ZsXXCWsG1Nzb1e3HD3RlOxe1tk/PK1e1XsStljcdM2dMBdVHszpks54tc1dJI+Aag6KS e5LQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=psy9a8RGluu+X7OgeL1qy5TMW8v6oPJEWU+aesET3IQ=; b=w6EAHC9+KtXipFT67lAG8RsFntyfJN1qyeeTFalSH6I8oBXcJQ6XzKkcp12yDJSELw 9278IGE1Wq14GrLuhkM/4EMcgkWw/m6MMundGVZykE4EFM75KU6gn5fTUBXn7wdOjn7e x+lizMRKikAfyroJpNUlkReYNobvPHFsMci2MIDO9o326HRGc1tRyejOE6wH1AADGlS8 47q42rLnowR2lS54wh5qw/d/H+esivZmCWO9dfp9zb6I7gneAzS3WQHvENHNlqfzV/Nw HvXdwVjVXL+UuQhWzEywO3uj8EaiO6s90JzjwJRPluHS7ePb03cPNcBz+SULsQqFDfkv nElA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s4si12225414ejr.369.2020.09.16.13.40.33; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726811AbgIPUjN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:39:13 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:34041 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726814AbgIPRHl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:07:41 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Nou1s9vYz+cUrR2WHtE+5bmWtavOnXNTzkmYmYyNz9he3RedrKqso6jG4PeERHFuPvdStOqspa 5URahKjvBt4g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9746"; a="158786308" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,433,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="158786308" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2020 08:57:11 -0700 IronPort-SDR: vO3xT64Rc9Yi4I8JGyJpAXgCwBYFYMUUsxDVJKwSyhAl6loi5G41Lvdam9Hynlg+TSCxVqE2wm Wn0Rbc5Rxv5Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,433,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="451910610" Received: from scusackx-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.249.45.87]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2020 08:57:04 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:57:02 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Borislav Petkov , Jethro Beekman , Darren Kenny , akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control hardware bits Message-ID: <20200916155702.GA21026@linux.intel.com> References: <20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200911124019.42178-3-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200914151816.u6camicid4bd5lgo@treble> <20200914153812.c6uh3spqmcy2ft3d@treble> <20200915095716.GI3612@linux.intel.com> <20200915132725.a2qbdio3jsu7rsqs@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200915132725.a2qbdio3jsu7rsqs@treble> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:57:16PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > Hi Jarko, > > > > > > > > It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists. > > > > Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing. > > > > > > > > Lore agrees with me: > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com/ > > > > > > And my first email to you bounced, similar to an email I tried sending > > > to Kristen a few weeks ago. Something weird going on with Intel mail > > > servers? > > > > Possible. I don't honestly know what is going on. > > > > At least now all the patches are out: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/ > > > > Not sure if a resend would make sense for the full patch set but maybe I > > just do quick iteration and send v38 soon. And just in case use some alt > > smtp server. > > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the > original thread. v38 has some missing patches as well. Now, v38 is there as complete but it has a duplicate version (they have exact same contents). Through the alternative mail server it just took hours to get them to LKML so I did another git send-email :-( Anyway, there is no difference between the patch sets marked as v38. > > -- > Josh > /Jarkko