Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:39:28 +0800
From:   Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
        raistlin@linux.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix sched_dl_global_validate()
Message-ID: <20200916153928.GA27602@iZj6chx1xj0e0buvshuecpZ>
References: <20200915152048.GA25835@iZj6chx1xj0e0buvshuecpZ>
 <20200916094203.GA6652@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200916094203.GA6652@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 15/09/20 23:20, Peng Liu wrote:
> > When user changes sched_rt_{runtime, period}_us, then
> > 
> >   sched_rt_handler()
> >     -->	sched_dl_bandwidth_validate()
> > 	{
> > 		new_bw = global_rt_runtime()/global_rt_period();
> > 
> > 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > 			dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
> > 			if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
> > 				ret = -EBUSY;
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > Under CONFIG_SMP, dl_bw is per root domain , but not per CPU,
> > dl_b->total_bw is the allocated bandwidth of the whole root domain.
> > we should compare dl_b->total_bw against cpus*new_bw, where 'cpus'
> > is the number of CPUs of the root domain.
> 
> Hummm, I think you are right. Guess nobody played a lot with changing
> global values. :-/
> 
> > Also, below annotation(in kernel/sched/sched.h) implied implementation
> > only appeared in SCHED_DEADLINE v2[1], then deadline scheduler kept
> > evolving till got merged(v9), but the annotation remains unchanged,
> > meaningless and misleading, correct it.
> > 
> > * With respect to SMP, the bandwidth is given on a per-CPU basis,
> > * meaning that:
> > *  - dl_bw (< 100%) is the bandwidth of the system (group) on each CPU;
> > *  - dl_total_bw array contains, in the i-eth element, the currently
> > *    allocated bandwidth on the i-eth CPU.
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/28/119
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > In fact, I'm not 100% sure that's a bug, since it's too 'obvious' and
> > not newly introduced code.
> > 
> > Also, the introduced #ifdef...#endif pairs look ugly, I have no idea
> > how to eliminate them. Ideas and comments are welcome. Thanks.
> 
> Can't we just use dl_bw_cpus() ?
> 

Oh, good idea, I will have a try. Thanks for your time!

> Thanks,
> Juri
>