Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:31:46 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     peterz@infradead.org
Cc:     Qian Cai <caiqian@redhat.com>, Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support
Message-ID: <20200917123146.1ddc2f6d@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20200916130233.GS2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200904153231.11994-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
        <224bd11b533dd2acff3f6cce51ab4ca676eb4f9f.camel@redhat.com>
        <20200915124817.GA127490@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net>
        <20200915143028.GB2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
        <32bfdec1ad4e11cfecd840e1b83d95ba2bab1abc.camel@redhat.com>
        <20200916125402.GR2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
        <1750732498.13475000.1600261259894.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
        <20200916130233.GS2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ZJigch=EJZvUj24UONED_0g";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/ZJigch=EJZvUj24UONED_0g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:02:33 +0200 peterz@infradead.org wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:00:59AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----- Original Message ----- =20
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: =20
> > > > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote: =20
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: =20
> > > > > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is d=
efined
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets ex=
pand in =20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > > > >=20
> > > > > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > > > > option. =20
> > > >=20
> > > > Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it=
? =20
> > >=20
> > > Did you verify it works? I only wrote it.. =20
> >=20
> > Yes, I did. =20
>=20
> Excellent, I'll stick a Tested-by from you on then.

I'll add this into the tip tree merge today (unless the tip tree is
updated in the mean time).

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/ZJigch=EJZvUj24UONED_0g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl9iypIACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gy1zggAjI2K6Kl9QkLwo+d/njeP3TD356LUn4zvKepNoeRA0/Wz9TWA4gRpaTzg
a28nOfWT3SNuuDSTxaw0/EAA6i1uBUSh0weJlsdwtO3B0Il/rzXRfJgfoCMJCd0a
CfhIWur6ceGx4y9+JY2lTV/ua4+lxqGofqKdA1U6bpWud3t9XGtJqUFn1NVFAYNd
1FOSw5aMISEPhiCGCH4dVTm855pgWGfH+9N5Cav75U01230Q8+ZCoMDCSdGqCrYf
ZvVH/RD/uxtGBdrUXW4EUt4i+XliTJyaY2kZzgyADcfB3SghfwmrhOQYoXURm3vV
iXH7/gv3r+uj+i4ZeoYnf+bsPWcf3g==
=sfKF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/ZJigch=EJZvUj24UONED_0g--