Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:35:19 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
To:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org,
        khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
        kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
        rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
        shy828301@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz, minchan@kernel.org, cai@lca.pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/32] per memcg lru_lock: reviews
Message-ID: <20200917143519.lhdfnoc47qrmbhaz@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2008262301240.4405@eggly.anvils>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009081640070.7256@eggly.anvils>
 <61a42a87-eec9-e300-f710-992756f70de6@linux.alibaba.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009091524260.10087@eggly.anvils>
 <855ad6ee-dba4-9729-78bd-23e392905cf6@linux.alibaba.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009111634020.22739@eggly.anvils>
 <5cfc6142-752d-26e6-0108-38d13009268b@linux.alibaba.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009150112130.1550@eggly.anvils>
 <20200915165807.kpp7uhiw7l3loofu@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
 <c3362c0a-3707-3a3d-9955-960d95f3ad8c@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c3362c0a-3707-3a3d-9955-960d95f3ad8c@linux.alibaba.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:37:45AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> 在 2020/9/16 上午12:58, Daniel Jordan 写道:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:21:56AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>> Uh, I updated the testing with some new results here:
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/26/212
> >> Right, I missed that, that's better, thanks.  Any other test results?
> > Alex, you were doing some will-it-scale runs earlier.  Are you planning to do
> > more of those?  Otherwise I can add them in.
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Does compaction perf scalable, like thpscale, I except they could get some benefit.

Yep, I plan to stress compaction.  Reclaim as well.

I should have said which Alex I meant.  I was asking Alex Duyck since he'd done
some will-it-scale runs.