Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp834313pxk; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqfAyUhEbMJkqI3ZTBbmj6XFI2jLnrhblv+RR7Ay5PIfI5LyeWSxstI8MOzDwGQHwYY8Ow X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a88a:: with SMTP id ha10mr35560826ejb.532.1600392236121; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600392236; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BWJuie3k6RkWxDeqI8/r+K4npS9DeCLDN3h9WdBns4TE70dEwRxa4nuX5y4eQ//u8F +ki/yysMxPL10dRoHDxZPnFwTJHhY3vxSL12aerb/xborArwWwFlj46qYoNk56H+fufi vTxBB53eHPhNAbN3+QZtnAUTf1B1dHPL2XYVHaLLCku6OVa5W4ijvSp6kwxaJN7FpC3O Txmb1fbreOTIwNvXraT2zsx3zRmAsJ2lRCbqrU/k0dLVvMk7uSUXJ5Fq11Rlj78X2DjT 4YDIJZYRSfOrnCXbti98FJSMVzuhTJfWPLX1E6NuBzOEVPzm36FsuPu4sQ0cIdFYh6i7 +R1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=ntRWwsLZdXKzppnyJXh6lY5T7DAwByuHapEeP4LlDok=; b=vkJY/l9DU0swpo9plCpWKPtquGh4p4/4vsHZJ/Kv8RPVyfZ2Iqyn2XSulrvg1WCIgd uEKeoXXnpsCmVdY6a5y9juAuYJ6AJ45RURasIqH7H2nhNlDYdZt8EgXLD26fbPD8W0Y4 X7tjctNLOEruB9QLsJWnwqpkv20Jh8dkwjezGjpYFbp+geq9VQyGSjcOzQpy1tdi/FQG fJhMf1LLwD5HogdXPbWxcKc0yv/cMst4TruJiFR0aqwqPF7a3zQUURBKjBHk9eVxsXHm 8F8+5rVoT3X+eo1byMWFxINlayynYzZ/8dJO3oYeMV6ipatCEBMlywdTx0EAiCl13lnj Cvqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d9si1023420edv.452.2020.09.17.18.23.32; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726187AbgIRBVi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:21:38 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:62750 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgIRBVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:21:38 -0400 IronPort-SDR: YnJxwXYTJ4lORONpDNVzAsat0SF74NcgpwYaIeqTwAxPgV9PLEs1hjR0KbIZQoRXITLSBnA6yC tOVAEkV32hdw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9747"; a="157215920" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,273,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="157215920" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 18:21:33 -0700 IronPort-SDR: vXUNcEFSqy2OWFuk6SZi+9xvIiTpHw2DjXVCXTlv+HPfBkIJj177JWUZw3mthx3BPOT1ESgeWj /Jd4PqPypNXg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,273,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="483979420" Received: from yjin15-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.5.239]) ([10.238.5.239]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 18:21:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list From: "Jin, Yao" To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , LKML , Andi Kleen , kan.liang@intel.com, "Jin, Yao" , Stephane Eranian References: <20200603021818.27028-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <911b4132-d1a1-f3c4-a2ed-2fcfe9a28fc6@linux.intel.com> <20200616193856.GC6393@kernel.org> <681a333b-e4dc-9481-715e-a65a34e10f83@linux.intel.com> <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <8ed53667-8241-1c58-ac2c-ecc9e9870afd@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:21:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaldo, On 9/7/2020 4:01 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao wrote: >>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset? >>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: >>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and >>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21. >>> >>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX >>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch. >>> >>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core >>>>> I tried using git am but get: >>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ >>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor >>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>> >>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. >>>> >>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right? >>> >>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more >>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly >>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge >>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to >>> rebase it like before. >>> >>> - Arnaldo >>> >> >> Can this event update be accepted? >> >> Thanks >> Jin Yao > > Can this event list update be accepted? > > Thanks > Jin Yao Ping again. :) Can this event update patchset be accepted? @Ian, I remembered you had tried this patchset and it's OK right? Thanks Jin Yao