Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 196/330] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:58:56 -0400
Message-Id: <20200918020110.2063155-196-sashal@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200918020110.2063155-1-sashal@kernel.org>
References: <20200918020110.2063155-1-sashal@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit d95fe371ecd28901f11256c610b988ed44e36ee2 ]

The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'

Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 1806b1da43665..3a2f022f6bde2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
 void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 	cpumask_t mask;
 
@@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	chip->restore = false;
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
 		int index;
-		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 
-		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
-		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
-		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
-		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
+		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+		if (!policy)
+			continue;
+		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
+		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
+		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
+		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 out:
 	put_online_cpus();
-- 
2.25.1