Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200917084905.1647262-1-ilie.halip@gmail.com> <20200917221620.n4vavakienaqvqvi@treble>
In-Reply-To: <20200917221620.n4vavakienaqvqvi@treble>
From:   Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:35:40 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHFW8PTFsmc7ykbrbdOYM6s-y1fpiV=7ee49BXaHjOkCMhBzhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: ignore unreachable trap after call to noreturn functions
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

> The patch looks good to me.  Which versions of Clang do the trap after
> noreturn call?  It would be good to have that in the commit message.

I omitted this because it happens with all versions of clang that are
supported for building the kernel. clang-9 is the oldest version that
could build the mainline x86_64 kernel right now, and it has the same
behavior.

Should I send a v2 with this info?

I.H.