Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1018754pxk; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:21:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuiDEKyRer7lS0egBWtzNoyHY7mcAwaewxuVfma2ab6rb6wuyhH2Z5f2y6ez9llQd8hmV+ X-Received: by 2002:a50:aa94:: with SMTP id q20mr36515215edc.119.1600417319667; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:21:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600417319; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FU/QH3EWXX6WwcrAN43OZe/0xLHXZo4fEBrEwXWTrKKHhozgkIZlDArN2wpKvbTh1D cPAXMtrwmIht0+KtyscpWhNkgBPAAEBiIrBNsmMAvbcfJ6xbKxv0D5EvZFksXF/bhb7C XVJsJBAwjkaE0ZP5VNbmmsU1Paee5uY17VtzkfpOZVSMGstU3ij1ZwuytyRCBeVETRzA HyL3trhR9OtzBlHPCHCuULlNKK9tkF2yktAjTPUttdbGpgLEnTrrmX2FaGPDVzjMHWOv QJyn8JyE//pmS+rlJsmqSjMWig0zckQnDJdvYH7REnf3rxfI5MzR4zGSbX9orKiudNIw EQRg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=BJGVXo9LuBYkG/UJ83GT4URHLbNRNG+Zxm/NJ71KpQM=; b=FjVY+nPzlrIhOuuX2nLjkO05s+CwvL/PaQ7wuQ+1tfXc9eh9YkV2o5oaaTebJrNQPg crImWM7JZqvj6isUVBgmE+sjCox3YNszOXFZHh7KuLxSro/N3+eRTkSugdOqiwlkDIOq sLgCIxrZzcyKvsABhHZlAoJ4sJJcWS44Ku5R3Cy6jGYQ7rE9h1gHjzt+tUCzNvCnhUxf mP6VwBSHr4CxG8AIxwt6eu6dun2PQb0LHngwH/aeJIlQnpSVm5tTRuCBGr80A7GNgHtz ghAT0hOXpLegwVG5dHIh2OxSqGMydQQizItggohtKm0nW80uMuYJhihBw+/yexz4ReOM iaUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=EJFz3tnF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s18si1965616eji.593.2020.09.18.01.21.36; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=EJFz3tnF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726382AbgIRITn (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 04:19:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45884 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726109AbgIRITm (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 04:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7788121D20; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:19:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600417181; bh=BJGVXo9LuBYkG/UJ83GT4URHLbNRNG+Zxm/NJ71KpQM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=EJFz3tnFnXVUibC3YjJ/aDnX9vkiw9iq4EOtKW9AY1UzHJjf1IKzyYfw1N2p1QO8m P6M8ES8lJXTghi6n/cG7hjYZ3GeO1N7Fc/cTU7jR211u/HsFoqwjlmyBMdPFS3JgdU 2ERcli34bBFhjIO+FPo08NLHVYa3E8zGl3lcg3RA= Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id t10so4702422wrv.1; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:19:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316qZap81LiF3C5fHOFDBXKQVafkq/HmSAVfuaWsTE/G+89jpzb FZPaQv6FmMXI3dfhJ+u80SFuLBZHIZ+LyMMUNbE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:724f:: with SMTP id ds15mr33866016ejc.119.1600417177168; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:19:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200917165301.23100-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200917165301.23100-10-krzk@kernel.org> <20200917201204.GG3969@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <20200917201204.GG3969@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:19:25 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] dt-bindings: pinctrl: include common schema in GPIO controllers To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Hoan Tran , Serge Semin , Richard Fitzgerald , Lee Jones , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Matthias Brugger , Geert Uytterhoeven , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Chris Packham , Anson Huang , Sungbo Eo , Stefan Agner , Srinivas Kandagatla , Magnus Damm , Yash Shah , Paul Kocialkowski , - , Matti Vaittinen , Amelie Delaunay , Cristian Ciocaltea , Paul Cercueil , Andy Teng , Sean Wang , Sricharan R , Chris Brandt , Jaroslav Kysela , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 22:12, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Include the common GPIO schema in GPIO controllers to be sure all common > > properties are properly validated. > > Shouldn't we delete the properties that are now redundant from these > schemas ? Good point. However not with "additionalPropeties: false". Schema requires all properties to be mentioned. I would need to use "unevaluatedProperties: false" in each file. What is preferred? Best regards, Krzysztof