Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:23:59 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     osalvador@suse.de
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
        aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zeil@yandex-team.ru, cai@lca.pw,
        nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] mm,hwpoison: Rework soft offline for in-use
 pages
Message-Id: <20200918172359.e862562a7ad22e92388ce218@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <7e948108488864b6d9131d990d5f6c80@suse.de>
References: <20200806184923.7007-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
        <20200806184923.7007-9-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
        <7e948108488864b6d9131d990d5f6c80@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:58:22 +0200 osalvador@suse.de wrote:

> I just found out yesterday that the patchset Naoya sent has diverged 
> from mine in some aspects that lead to some bugs [1].
> This was due to a misunderstanding so no blame here.
> So, patch#8 and patch#9 need a little tweak [2].
> 
> I was wondering what do you prefer?

Well.  I (and I suspect the rest of the world) have lost track of
what's going on here.

So please let's have a full resend of the whole series?