Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:10:29 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 101/330] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Fix ref count
 for devices with their own PE
Message-ID: <20200919181029.GI2431@sasha-vm>
References: <20200918020110.2063155-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20200918020110.2063155-101-sashal@kernel.org>
 <52532d8a-8e90-8a68-07bd-5a3e08c58475@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <52532d8a-8e90-8a68-07bd-5a3e08c58475@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:35:06AM +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
>
>Le 18/09/2020 ? 03:57, Sasha Levin a ?crit?:
>>From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>>[ Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 ]
>>
>
>This patch is not desirable for stable, for 5.4 and 4.19 (it was 
>already flagged by autosel back in April. Not sure why it's showing 
>again now)

Hey Fred,

This was a bit of a "lie", it wasn't a run of AUTOSEL, but rather an
audit of patches that went into distro/vendor trees but not into the
upstream stable trees.

I can see that this patch was pulled into Ubuntu's 5.4 tree, is it not
needed in the upstream stable tree?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha