Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:00:21 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC support for arm64.
Message-ID: <20200921110020.GA2139@willie-the-truck>
References: <20200717110532.238533-1-asteinhauser@google.com>
 <20200907171825.GB13281@willie-the-truck>
 <CAN_oZf29J-DMF04EhQf=29CzV5zrPT+L6HchZcG-CDt=MjFf4A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN_oZf29J-DMF04EhQf=29CzV5zrPT+L6HchZcG-CDt=MjFf4A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi Anthony,

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 03:25:23AM -0700, Anthony Steinhauser wrote:
> > As a heads up: I'm currently reworking most of this, and hope to post
> > something within the next two weeks.
> 
> Sure. Let me know whether you want to implement the
> PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC support directly or whether this patch would be
> relevant even after your rework.

I posted a first cut at the rework on Friday:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-September/602709.html

so maybe you could take a look at implementing PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC
on top of that? If not, please let me know and I can look into it as I
think it should be reasonably straightforward.

Will