Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/34] i2c: tegra: Use clk-bulk helpers
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200908224006.25636-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20200908224006.25636-13-digetx@gmail.com> <20200917113846.GX3515672@ulmo>
 <175e7f54-36f0-32c6-35a3-14c5b5e89e95@gmail.com>
 <20200921111257.GF3950626@ulmo>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7b3b9e21-f8c8-eebb-85bb-af62fc204f10@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:44:38 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200921111257.GF3950626@ulmo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

21.09.2020 14:12, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:01:56PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>> It's still possible to add the clk-num checking, but it should be
>> unpractical. We could always add it later on if there will be a real
>> incident. Do you agree?
> 
> There's also clk_bulk_get(), which allows you to specify the number of
> clocks and their consumer IDs that you want to request. That seems like
> it would allow us to both avoid the repetitive calls to clk APIs and at
> the same time allows us to specify exactly which clocks we need. Would
> that not work as a compromise?

I'll change to use clk_bulk_get(), thanks.