Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:53:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:53:04 -0500 Received: from router.go.cz ([62.24.73.20]:18816 "EHLO napalm.go.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:52:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:52:13 +0100 From: Jan Dvorak To: J Sloan Cc: Alan Cox , Linux kernel Subject: Re: Nasty suprise with uptime Message-ID: <20011030235213.A854@go.cz> Mail-Followup-To: J Sloan , Alan Cox , Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <3BDDBE89.397E42C0@lexus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3BDDBE89.397E42C0@lexus.com>; from jjs@lexus.com on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:37PM -0800 Organization: (www.kraxnet.cz) X-URL: http://www.johnydog.cz/ X-OS: Linux 2.4.13 i686 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:37PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > So, is there an implicit Linux policy to upgrade > the distro, or at least the kernel, every 496 days > whether it needs it or not? Rather, you should think about your poor hw. It's nice to sit down at least once a year, to clean up your box of that spider/ant feudalistic colonies, bug airports, to check connectors, upgrade some components, and other such things which you can't risk doing online at 32bit platform. You know, there are some x86s which wasn't projected to even LAST as long as one year :-) Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/